Posted by Kevin on June 20, 2017 under Bankruptcy Blog | 
Can you really keep everything you own if you file bankruptcy? The Answer: Usually Yes.
Some basics.
There are two basic types of consumer bankruptcies. Chapter 7 is an asset based approach. The Chapter 7 trustee sells your “non-exempt” property and pays your creditors. Chapter 13 is an income based approach where you generally keep your assets but have to make payments to your creditors over a 36-60 month period.
There are two types of creditors: secured creditors (they took collateral as a condition of granting you credit, and can look to the collateral to be paid even after the bankruptcy), and unsecured creditors (basically no collateral).
The purpose of bankruptcy is to give an honest debtor a fresh start. That means that most, if not all, of your debts are discharged, and you can keep all or most of your property.
Now how is that accomplished.
In a Chapter 13, as stated above, you keep the property you want to keep in exchange for making payments over the term of 36-60 months.
In a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy,” your debts are discharged—legally written off forever—in return for you giving your unprotected assets to your creditors (as represented by the bankruptcy trustee). But here is the good part: for most people, all or most of their assets ARE protected, or “exempt.” from the trustee and your creditors. Why? The fresh start.
Property Exemptions- The Basics
- The Bankruptcy Code has a set of federal exemptions, and each state also has its own exemptions. In some states you have a choice between using the federal exemptions or the state exemptions, while in other states you are only permitted to use the state exemptions. In New Jersey, we can use either. In many states, choosing which of the two exemption schemes is better for you is often not clear. However, in New Jersey, debtors generally use the federal exemptions. Why? Because many of the New Jersey exemptions were created by statute about 100 year ago or more, and were not adjusted for inflation. Moreover, New Jersey has no homestead exemption.
- If you have moved relatively recently from another state, you may have to use the exemption rules of your prior state. Because different state’s exemption types and amounts can differ widely, thousands of dollars can be at stake depending on when your bankruptcy case is filed.
- In some circumstances, it is not clear how the federal exemptions will be applied. What if you own a car and you owe $10,000 on your car loan. Clearly, the bank (secured lender) has an interest as do you. But, the trustee also may be able to make a claim to part of the value to the car, and sell it.
Navigating through exemptions can be much more complicated than it looks, and is one of the most important services provided by your bankruptcy attorney. It can maximize the amount of property you keep after receiving your bankruptcy discharge.
Posted by Kevin on May 23, 2017 under Bankruptcy Blog |
In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the trustee sells non-exempt assets to pay your creditors. The Code provides certain dollar limit exemptions for your home, car, household items and the like. The problem for some debtors is that Chapter 7 may not exempt all their assets. Chapter 13 is often an excellent way to keep possessions that are not “exempt”—which are worth too much or have too much equity so that their value exceeds the allowed exemption, or that simply don’t fit within any available exemption.
Options Other Than Chapter 13
If you want to protect possessions which are not exempt, you may have some choices besides Chapter 13.
You could just go ahead and file a Chapter 7 case and surrender the non-exempt asset to the trustee. This may be a sensible choice if that asset is something you don’t really need, such as equipment or inventory from a business that you’ve closed. Surrendering an asset under Chapter 7 may also make sense if you have “priority” debts that you want and need to be paid—such as recent income taxes or back child support—which the Chapter 7 trustee would pay with the proceeds of sale of your surrendered asset(s), ahead of the other debts.
There are also asset protection techniques—such as selling or encumbering those assets before filing the bankruptcy, or negotiating payment terms with the Chapter 7 trustee —which are delicate procedures beyond the scope of this blog post.
Chapter 13 Non-Exempt Asset Protection
Under Chapter 13 you can keep that asset by paying over time for the privilege of keeping it. Your attorney simply calculates your Chapter 13 plan so that your creditors receive as much as they would have received if you would have surrendered that asset to a Chapter 7 trustee.
For example, if you own a free and clear vehicle worth $3,000 more than the applicable exemption, you would pay that amount into your plan (in addition to amounts being paid to secured creditors such as back payments on your mortgage). You would have 3 to 5 years—the usual span of a Chapter 13 case—throughout which time you’d be protected from your creditors. Your asset-protection payments are spread out over this length of time, making it relatively easy and predictable to pay.
It gets better-in some Chapter 13s you can retain your non-exempt assets without paying anything more to your creditors than if you did not have any assets to protect. If you owe recent income taxes and/or back support payments (or any other special “priority” debts which must be paid in full in a Chapter 13 case), you can use these debts to your advantage. Since in a Chapter 7 case such “priority” debts would be paid in full before other creditors would receive any proceeds of the sale of any surrendered assets, if the amount of such “priority” debts are more than the asset value you are seeking to protect, you may well only need to pay enough into your Chapter 13 case to pay off these “priority” debts.
This is in contrast to negotiating with a Chapter 7 trustee to pay to keep an asset, in which you would usually have less time to pay it and less predictability as to how much you’d have to pay.
Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13 Asset Protection
Whether the asset(s) that you are protecting is worth the additional time and expense of a Chapter 13 case depends on the importance of that asset, and other factors. Generally, this is not a DIY project. You need to speak with competent bankruptcy counsel to review your options
Posted by Kevin on April 17, 2017 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If your business needs bankruptcy relief, you have to start with basic questions about how your business was set up and its debt amount.
Sole Proprietorship
The most straightforward business bankruptcies tend to be those in which the business is a sole proprietorship. Your business is operated through you under your name or under an assumed business name (“doing business as” or “DBA”). So, for purposes of bankruptcy, if you operate a sole proprietorship, you file bankruptcy in your name and it will include your personal assets and liabilities and the assets and liabilities of the business.
Other Forms of Business
Basically, this includes corporations, partnerships and LLC’s (limited liability companies). In these cases, the business entity is the debtor. If the owner of the business is liable under guaranties, the owner might also need to file an individual bankruptcy.
Purpose of Bankruptcy
Once you have established what type of business entity is involved, the basic question is whether you want to utilize bankruptcy as a tool to continue in business or as a tool to liquidate and shut down the business.
The General Guidance
Beyond these initial points, here are some basic rules. They will help you be a bit more prepared when you come to meet with an attorney.
1. A corporation, or LLC, or partnership cannot file a Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts.” Only an “individual” can. So, if you operate a sole proprietorship, you and the business may be eligible for a Chapter 13 filing.
2. Chapter 13s are sometimes mislabeled “wage-earner plans,” but any source of “regular income” is allowed.” The requirement is simply “income sufficiently stable and regular to… make payments under a plan under Chapter 13.” So if your business income—combined with any other income—is even somewhat stable, you would likely qualify under this “regular income” requirement.
3. But you and your sole proprietorship CAN’T file a Chapter 13 case if your total unsecured debt is $394,725 or more, or if your total secured debt is $1,184,200 or more. (Note: these limits are adjusted for inflation every three years.) While these may seem like relatively high maximums, be aware that they include BOTH personal and business debts (since you are personally liable for all the debts of a sole proprietorship). Also, the amount of unsecured debt can include that portion of your mortgages and other secured debts in excess of the value of the collateral. So a $750,000 debt secured by real estate now worth $550,000 adds $200,000 to the unsecured debt total. In addition, if you want to file a Chapter 13 as an individual and you are the owner of a corporation, you may have to consider as your unsecured debts those debts of the corporation which you personally guaranteed.
4. If your debt totals are above one of the above debt limits, you can still file a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy” case for the business, but that means, for all intents and purposes, the business will shut down. Chapter 7 tends to be a better option for cleaning up after a closed business, whatever its legal form.
5. A corporation or LLC does not receive a discharge in a Chapter 7.
6. If your debt totals are above one of the Chapter 13 debt limits and you are trying to save the business, one option is a Chapter 11 “business reorganization.” for the corporation, LLC, or partnership. The disadvantages of Chapter 11 are that it is a hugely more complicated than Chapter 13 which translates into substantially higher legal, filing and Trustee fees, and the financial reporting requirements are more onerous. Bankruptcy courts have tried to address these shortcomings with streamlined “small business” Chapter 11s, but they are still often prohibitively expensive.
7. If you do end up filing a personal Chapter 7 case when owing substantial business debt, you may have the advantage of being exempt from qualifying under the “means test” (a test based on your income and allowed expenses) if your business debts are more than half of your total debts.
If you are trying to save your financially struggling business, it is crucial to get competent business bankruptcy advice, and to do so just as soon as possible. You have no doubt been working extremely hard trying to keep your business alive. You will need a solid game plan for using the bankruptcy and other laws to your advantage.
Posted by on March 30, 2017 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you owe recent income taxes, or multiple years of taxes, Chapter 13 can provide huge advantages over Chapter 7, and over other options.
The Example
Consider a husband and wife with the following scenario:
- Husband lost his job in 2008, so he started a business, which, after a few promising years in which it generated some income, failed in late 2012.
- The wife was consistently employed throughout this time, with pay raises only enough to keep up with inflation.
- They did not have the money to pay the quarterly estimated taxes while husband’s business was in operation, and also could not pay the amount due when they filed their joint tax returns for 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012. To simplify the facts, for each of those five years they owe the IRS $4,000 in taxes, $750 in penalties, and $250 in interest. So their total IRS debt for those years is $25,000—including $20,000 in the tax itself, $3,750 in penalties, and $1,250 in interest.
- Husband found a reliable job six months ago, although earning 20% less than he did at the one he lost before he started his business.
- They filed every one of their joint tax returns in mid-April when they were due, and have been making modest payments on their tax balance when they have been able to.
- They have no debts with collateral—no mortgage, no vehicle loans.
- They owe $35,000 in medical bills and credit cards.
- They can currently afford to pay about $500 a month to all of their creditors, which is not nearly enough to pay their regular creditors, and that’s before paying a dime to the IRS.
- They are in big financial trouble.
Without Any Kind of Bankruptcy
- If they tried to enter into an installment payment plan with the IRS, they would be required to pay the entire tax obligation, with interest and penalties continuing to accrue until all was paid in full.
- The IRS monthly payment amount would be imposed likely without regard to the other debts they owe.
- If the couple failed to make their payments, the IRS would try to collect through garnishments and tax liens.
- Depending how long paying all these taxes would take, the couple could easily end up paying $30,000 to $35,000 with the additional interest and penalties.
- This would be in addition to their $35,000 medical and credit card debts, which could easily increase to $45,000 or more when debts went to collections or lawsuits.
- So the couple would eventually end up being forced to pay at least $75,000 to their creditors.
Under Chapter 13
- The 2008 and 2009 taxes, interest and penalties would very likely be paid nothing and discharged at the end of the case. Same with the penalties for 2010, 2011, and 2012. That covers $11,500 of the $25,000 present tax debt.
- The remaining $13,500 of taxes and interest for 2010, 2011, and 2012 would have to be paid as a “priority” debt, although without any additional interest or penalties once the Chapter 13 case is filed.
- Assuming that their income qualified them for a three-year Chapter 13 plan, this couple would likely be allowed to pay about $500 per month for 36 months, or about $18,000, even though they owe many times that to all their creditors.
- This would be enough to pay the $13,500 “priority” portion of the taxes and interest, plus the “administrative expenses” (the Chapter 13 trustee fees and your attorney fees).
- Then after three years of payments, they’d be completely done. The “priority” portion of the IRS debt would have been paid in full, but the older IRS debt and all the penalties would be discharged (written off), likely without being paid anything. So would the credit card and medical debts.
After the three years, under Chapter 13 the couple would have paid a total of around $18,000, instead of eventually paying at least $75,000 without the Chapter 13 case. They’d be done—debt-free—instead of just barely starting to pay their mountain of debt. And they would have not spent the last three years worrying about IRS garnishments and tax liens, lawsuits and harassing phone calls, and the constant lack of money for necessary living expenses.
The next blog post will follow up on this theme.
Posted by on September 8, 2016 under Bankruptcy Blog |
How to How to Get the Most Out of Your Bankruptcy
The focus in bankruptcy is on dealing with your debts, wiping out and getting a handle on the negative side of your balance sheet. But getting a financial fresh start means not just getting relieved of your debts, but also protecting your essential assets—the positive side of your balance sheet. You can maximize this crucial benefit of bankruptcy by not selling, using up, or borrowing against your protected assets BEFORE filing your bankruptcy case.
In my daily work as a bankruptcy attorney, I constantly meet with new clients who have sold, spent, or borrowed against important assets in desperate attempts to keep their heads above water. This is usually a mistake.
Bankruptcy Protects Assets
If you are like most people, bankruptcy will protect all of your assets. First, Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy” protects all “exempt” assets, so that a very high percentage of people who file under Chapter 7 keep everything they own. Oddly enough, this is called a “no asset case” because the Trustee does not administer (= sells) any of the debtor’s assets. Second, if you have assets which are worth more than the applicable “exempt” amounts provided by law, Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” can almost always protect those “non-exempt” assets as well. And third, if you do have assets that are not “exempt,” with wise pre-bankruptcy planning with a knowledgeable bankruptcy attorney, those assets may be all the better protected once your bankruptcy case is filed.
Get Legal Advice BEFORE Wasting Your Assets
If you are considering spending, selling, or borrowing against any of your assets to pay your debts, do you know whether that asset is one which would be protected in bankruptcy?
Consider a person in her late-50s cashing in a substantial amount of her 401(k) retirement plan to keep paying creditors when those creditors could be—and eventually are–written off in bankruptcy. That decision would likely significantly harm the quality of her retirement lifetime, with no tangible benefit to show for it. Or consider a husband and wife selling a free-and-clear vehicle that’s in good condition to pay creditors that eventually are written off in bankruptcy. Under certain circumstances, that vehicle may be exempted or a deal can be made with the trustee that allows you to keep the vehicle.
These kinds of decisions can have serious long-term consequences, so they shouldn’t be made without legal advice about the alternatives.
Posted by on May 28, 2016 under Bankruptcy Blog |
From the mid-1990’s to 2005, the creditor lobby worked hard to change the Bankruptcy Code. In their eyes, too many people, who could afford to pay part of their debts, were filing under Chapter 7 and walking away scot free. They wanted people to be forced into Chapter 13, where you have to make monthly payments to a Trustee for 36-60 months if the prospective debtor had the means to pay. Finally, in 2005, Congress changed the law which is called “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection ” Act (BAPCPA). 11 years later, there is still confusion among the public about whether you can still file for Chapter 7, or you must file under Chapter 13. To qualify for Chapter 7, you have to pass the Means Test, the bankruptcy court version of what the IRS uses to determine what you can pay on back taxes. The Means Test is not straightforward, and some issues concerning its application are not clear even after a decade of BAPCPA. However, the bottom line is that you can still file under Chapter 7.
1. Bad Publicity
The creditor lobby, the media and sometimes even the bankruptcy system have all had a hand in making many people think that qualifying for “straight bankruptcy” is hard. While it is true that for the first couple of years, Chapter 13 filings were up, after debtor attorneys started to understand the new system, the vast majority of filings in New Jersey are still under Chapter 7.
2. A Confusing Statute
Upfront, BAPCPA is loaded with abuse prevention but I don’t see much consumer protection. The law is poorly written, confusing and sometimes one section contradicts another section. Moreover, because of these statutory contradictions and ambiguities, Courts, all the way up to the Supreme Court, have been scratching their heads trying to make sense of it. If the judges are having trouble with the complexities of the new law, then it is no surprise that ordinary people are confused.
3. Most Can “Skip” the “Means Test”
Parts of the “means test”–the major mechanism now for qualifying under Chapter 7—are mind-numbingly confusing, but many people can avoid all that simply by virtue of their income. Without getting into the calculations here, basically if your “income” (as specially defined for this purpose) before filing was no more than the published median income amount for your state and size of family, then you qualify for Chapter 7 without needing to go through any more of the “means test.”
Also, certain kinds of folks can skip the “means test” no matter the amount of their income, specifically present or recent business owners who have more business debt than consumer debt.
4. Passing the Means Test turned out to be easier than we thought
Even if you are a consumer debtor whose “income” IS higher than the applicable median income amount, through some good lawyering, which is creative but perfectly legitimate, you may well be able to lower your “income” or increase the reporting of your expenses to bring your overall under the applicable median amount. If so, you qualify for Chapter 7.
5. Chapter 13 is Sometimes the Better Option
The purpose of the “means test” is to make people who have the “means” pay back some of their debts through a Chapter 13 case. In the relatively few times that a person does not qualify under Chapter 7 and so has to do a Chapter 13 case, in almost all cases, the amount that must be paid in the Chapter 13 case to the creditors is much less than the total debt, making it not such a bad deal. Also, often a person who “just wants to file Chapter 7 and get it over with” learns that Chapter 13 comes with surprising advantages, which are more helpful to the debtor in the long run.
Posted by on April 28, 2016 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 7 and 13 are very different debt-fighting tools. But that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s obvious which is right for you.
The Not Always So Easy Choice
Once it is clear that you need bankruptcy relief, picking the right Chapter to file can be simple. Your circumstances may all point towards one option or the other. But sometimes it can be far from clear cut.
The First Impression IS Often Right
To be clear, when my clients first come in to see me, many have a good idea whether they want to file a Chapter 7 or a 13. There is lots of information available about this, including on this website. So lots of my clients come in having done some homework. Or at least they’ve heard something about the two Chapters and have an impression which makes sense to them. But sometimes after we have reviewed all the facts and options, the initial impression proves wrong.
An Illustration
Let’s say you have a home you’ve been struggling to hold onto for the last year or two, but by now have pretty much decided it wasn’t worth doing so any more. You’re seriously behind on both the first and the second mortgages. Like so many other people, the home is worth a lot less than you owe. In fact, let’s say you owe on the first mortgage a little more than what the home is worth, plus another $75,000 on the second mortgage, so the home is “under water” by that amount. Although for the last couple of years you’ve been hoping that the market value will start heading back up, but it’s just held steady. You and your family would definitely like to stay there, buy you absolutely can’t pay both mortgages. Besides it makes little economic sense to keep struggling to hang onto property worth $75,000 less than what you owe. So you’ve decided it’s time to give up on the home, and just file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
But then you meet with your bankruptcy attorney and find out some surprising good news. Because your home is worth less than the balance on the first mortgage, through a Chapter 13 case you can “strip” the second mortgage off the title of your home. You no longer have to make the monthly payments on it, making keeping your home all of a sudden hundreds of dollars cheaper each month. In return for paying into your Chapter 13 Plan a designated amount each month based on your budget, and doing so for the three-to-five year length of your Chapter 13 case, you can keep your home usually by paying very little—and sometimes nothing—on that $75,000 second mortgage. At the end of your case, whatever amount is left unpaid on that second mortgages would be “discharged”—legally written-off—so you own the home without that mortgage. You are debt-free, other than your first mortgage.
This “stripping” of the second mortgage is NOT available under the Chapter 7 that you initially thought you should file. The ability to keep your home by significantly lowering its monthly cost to you and bringing the debt against it much closer to its value could well swing your choice towards filing Chapter 13, contrary to your initial intention.
So, the Best Advice: Meet with Your Attorney with an Open Mind
Posted by on August 15, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you had struggled to keep a business open, but have decided to throw in the towel, there’s a good chance you owe taxes. Here’s how to deal with them.
The Basic Choice
Let’s assume that you are seriously considering filing bankruptcy, but want to know your options.
You have two choices within bankruptcy for addressing tax debts after closing down a small business:
1. File a Chapter 7 case to discharge (legally write-off) all the debt that you can, which may include some of your tax debt, and then deal directly with the IRS and any other tax authorities to either pay the rest of the taxes in monthly installment payments or to negotiate a settlement (called an Offer in Compromise in the case of the IRS).
2. File a Chapter 13 case to deal with all your debts, which again may include the discharge of some of your tax debt, while you pay the rest of the taxes through a court-approved Chapter 13 plan, and being protected throughout the process from collection actions by the IRS and any other tax authorities.
Putting aside the many factors distinct from taxes, choosing between Chapter 7 or 13 comes down to this key question: Would the amount of tax that you would still owe after completing a Chapter 7 case be small enough so that you could reliably make reasonable payments to the Internal Revenue Service (or other tax authority) which would satisfy that obligation within a sensible time period?
Answering that Question
The idea is that Chapter 7 is likely the way to go if you don’t need the long-term protection that comes with Chapter 13. In a Chapter 7 case, once that case is completed—usually only about three to four months after it is filed—the IRS/state can resume collection activity on the taxes that were not discharged in bankruptcy. You clearly want to avoid that. So a Chapter 7 makes sense ONLY IF before any collection activity begins you have arranged with the IRS/state to make payments, and 1) those payments are reasonable in amount, 2) your circumstances are stable enough so that you are confident that you will be able to pay them consistently, and 3) the length of time you would be making payments does not stretch out so long that the interest and penalties get too high.
Your attorney will be able to tell you—usually with high reliability—which tax debts will and will not be discharged in a Chapter 7 case, and thus how much in taxes you still owe. Then the next step is determining what the IRS/state would require you to pay in monthly payments, or possibly would accept in settlement. Your bankruptcy attorney may be able to give you guidance about this, or may need to refer you to a tax specialist (usually an accountant). Once you know the likely monthly installment payment amount—assuming you go that route—then you need to seriously consider whether that would be an amount you could reliably, reasonably pay, without incurring too much in interest and penalties before you paid it off.
If so, Chapter 7 likely is more appropriate. If not, then Chapter 13 is likely better because it gives you much more protection.
Posted by on July 21, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you’re filing a Chapter 13 case, what choices do you have about your income tax refund?
Start with What Happens with Refunds in Chapter 7
To understand how tax refunds are treated under Chapter 13, it helps to compare how they are treated under Chapter 7. For more details about that, see my last blog. But to summarize, when you file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy usually you can keep your tax refund either by 1) smart timing of the bankruptcy filing, or 2) by the use of “exemptions.” If you wait to file your case until after you have received and appropriately spent the refund (carefully following the advice of your attorney on where to spend it), then this refund is not an “asset of your bankruptcy estate”—the bankruptcy trustee and your creditors have no claim on it. On the other hand, if the refund IS an “asset of your bankruptcy estate” but it is covered by an “exemption,” then the refund is protected and you get to keep it.
The Good News about Tax Refunds under Chapter 13
- As with Chapter 7, if you are flexible about when to file your case, wait until you have received and spent the refund appropriately.
- Better than Chapter 7, if you have to file your Chapter 13 case when your tax refund is still pending, you may be able to get permission to spend that refund—or part of it—for some urgent and necessary expense, instead of having it just go to pay creditors.
- Also better than Chapter 7, to the extent that you are required to pay all or part of the refund to the trustee, you would likely have some discretion about where that money would get paid, by including that in the terms of your Chapter 13 plan.
But This Comes with Some Not So Good News
- Chapter 7 focuses only on assets you own or have a right to when the case is filed. So it involves only the tax refunds that are pending at that point in time. Chapter 13 in contrast involves your income throughout the three to five years that your case is active. Since future tax refunds are considered part of your ongoing income, they need to be accounted for, and generally must be paid to the trustee to pay to your creditors.
Paying the Trustee Future Tax Refunds Is Usually Not So Bad
- Usually you can minimize the issue by reducing the payroll tax withholdings made by your employer, thereby reducing that tax year’s refund. As a result you are giving yourself more money each month for living expenses or for making your Chapter 13 plan payments.
- If you still do receive a relatively large refund during your case, and you have some out-of-the-ordinary urgent need for all or part of that money, you may be able to get trustee and/or court permission to use it for that purpose.
- Even to the extent that you still have refunds going to the Chapter 13 trustee during the years of your case, that money could well be doing some serious good work, such as:
- In many situations that additional money beyond your regular monthly plan payments allows you to complete your case faster, giving you an earlier fresh start.
- Important creditors would likely be paid more quickly—such as a child support arrearage or the payoff of a vehicle.
- The extra money from the refunds may be critical in allowing you to pay off the plan within the mandatory maximum 5-years, so that you can discharge all your remaining debts and have a successful Chapter 13 case.
Conclusion
As with Chapter 7, you can usually time the filing of your Chapter 13 case so that you can keep your current-year income tax refund(s). But if you can’t wait to file, then under Chapter 13 you tend to have more control over what happens with the pending tax refund(s). You do have the disadvantage of losing some control over the next few years of tax refunds, but that is less of a practical problem than it may seem for the reasons just outlined.
Posted by on June 11, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Did You Know…
- The first income tax was enacted during the Civil War, but it expired a few years after the war ended.
- The first peacetime income tax was passed in 1894, an effort of the Populists to get the wealthy to pay a greater share of the cost of the national government. It was a two percent tax on incomes over $4,000 (worth about $108,000 in today’s dollars), which at the time affected only about the top two percent of wage earners.
- The next year the U.S. Supreme Court overturned this law as unconstitutional, in a 5-4 decision. Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 158 U.S. 161 (1895).
- A constitutional amendment to allow an income tax was proposed by the Republican President William Howard Taft, and the resolution for that amendment was passed by Congress with the Republicans in control of both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
- The entire Sixteenth Amendment states: “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.”
- After the required 3/4ths of state legislatures (36 of the 48 then-existing states) ratified it, on February 25, 1913 the Sixteenth Amendment was proclaimed ratified and became part of the Constitution.
So February 25, 2013 was the 100 year anniversary of the income tax becoming constitutional. Funny, I don’t remember any anniversary celebrations!
The MOST Interesting Facts
As the blogs in this series on taxes have been describing, bankruptcy can help you with income tax debts in a variety of ways. If it’s true that in life the facts that are most interesting to you are those that are going to help your pocketbook, then check out the following facts:
- Some income taxes CAN be forever discharged (legally written off).
- Taxes can be discharged under either Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, depending on which is right for you based on your other circumstances.
- The protection from creditors you receive by filing bankruptcy—the “automatic stay”—protects you from the IRS (and other tax creditors) like any other creditor.
- In a Chapter 13 payment plan, that protection can last for 3 to 5 years, giving you that much time to pay taxes that can’t be discharged.
- Even if you owe a tax that can’t be discharged, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy can put you in a much better position afterwards either to enter into a payment plan or negotiate a settlement.
- Chapter 13 usually stops accruing interest and penalties on tax debts that can’t be discharged, reducing the overall amount you have to pay.
- If you owe a number of years of income taxes, Chapter 13 is often an excellent tool because all your taxes—as well as all your other debts—are handled in one tidy package.
Taxes and bankruptcy DO mix, often greatly in your favor.
Posted by on May 30, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you can’t discharge your income tax debt through Chapter 7, or make workable payment arrangements on the remaining tax debt, then Chapter 13 can be a good solution.
The Previous Chapter 7 Options
A consistent theme through these past blogs has been that in many situations you do not need to incur the extra expense and time of going through a three-to-five-year Chapter 13 case when other solutions will work. But Chapter 13 IS often an excellent mechanism for resolving all your income tax debts (and usually all your other debts, too).
Chapter 13 Can Be the Easiest Way to Address Your Income Tax Debts
A Chapter 13 payment plan is often a significantly easier way to deal with income tax debts than the other alternatives because:
1. The payment amount going to the taxes are often more reasonable than the IRS/state would require. That’s because they are based on what you can actually afford, by allowing you more reasonable amounts for your expenses.
2. Your Chapter 13 case incorporates ALL your debts in one package, so that you are not forced to satisfy the IRS/state to the exclusion of other important creditors (such as your mortgage, vehicle payments, and child/spousal support). The taxes may have to wait their turn to be paid after debts that are a higher priority for you, instead of just getting paid first.
3. Putting all your debts into one Chapter 13 package also includes all categories of your income taxes—particularly those that are being discharged and those that aren’t. This avoids the situation under Chapter 7 in which you discharge some of the taxes but then have to deal directly with the IRS/state for the taxes that were not discharged.
4. The payments going to the IRS/state can be adjusted during the course of the Chapter 13 if your circumstances change, usually without much room for their objection.
Chapter 13 Can Be a Cheaper Way to Pay Non-Discharged Taxes
It can be cheaper because:
1. In contrast to the other scenarios, under Chapter 13 usually no more interest and penalties can be added after the case is filed.
2. Often you don’t have to pay even the previously accrued penalties.
3. If you have a tax lien attached to any of your tax debts, the lien can sometimes be paid off more cheaply by paying the secured value of the lien instead of the full tax.
If your tax debt is high, and you are paying into your plan for the full five years, these savings can amount to many thousands of dollars.
Chapter 13 Is a Safer Way to Pay Non-Discharged Taxes
It’s safer because:
1. Instead of being at the mercy of the IRS/state if you are not able to make a payment, under Chapter 13 your “automatic stay” protection from all your creditors—including tax creditors—persists throughout your case. So you are not a hair-trigger away from being hit with tax liens, or levies on your wage and bank accounts.
2. You CAN lose this protection, but if you and your attorney deal with your situation proactively you can usually preserve it.
3. This protection is particularly important when your circumstances change—instead of being at the mercy of the IRS/state, your attorney can make adjustments to your Chapter 13 plan. Or if necessary, even more aggressive or creative steps may be appropriate, such as changing to a new bankruptcy case. The point is that you usually have much more control over the situation.
Posted by Kevin on April 10, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
The appropriately criticized Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) tried to prevent perceived abuses of the bankruptcy laws in a number of ways. One of them you’ve probably not heard about and can give you a bad surprise if you stumble into it.
The Bad Surprise
Beside the legal write-off (“discharge”) of your debts, the other big benefit you usually get from filing bankruptcy is protection from your creditors. That legal protection is called the “automatic stay,” and prohibits creditors from pursuing you or your money or your other assets. It goes into effect the moment your bankruptcy case is filed, and lasts throughout the life of your case—the few months of a Chapter 7 case and the few years of a Chapter 13 case (unless a creditor files a motion and gets special court permission, the so-called creditor’s “relief from stay”).
But imagine filing a bankruptcy and getting no protection at all from your creditors. Being in a bankruptcy case with the creditors still being able to call you, sue you, garnish your wages. Imagine this happening when you totally don’t expect it. That WOULD indeed be a bad surprise.
Having this happen is very rare, but considering the extreme consequences you want to make absolutely sure that it does not happen to you.
The Abuse Being Addressed
The problem arises in certain circumstances if you filed a prior bankruptcy case which got dismissed—closed without being completed. Before Congress put this law into effect, a very, very small minority of people filing bankruptcy–usually people without attorneys representing them—would file a series of bankruptcies, one after another, for the purpose of continuously delaying a foreclosure or some other action by a creditor. After their first bankruptcy case would get dismissed, they would file another one just in time to again impose the “automatic stay” and stop the foreclosure or other creditor action, and then repeat the cycle. You can see how this could be seen as an abuse of bankruptcy in general and abuse of the “automatic stay” protection in particular.
The Rules
So this is the law that Congress passed to counter this. It has two main parts.
First, if you are filing a bankruptcy case now, AND you filed ONE previous bankruptcy case during the one year before filing this new one, AND that previous case was dismissed, the “automatic stay” goes into effect when you case is filed BUT AUTOMATICALLY EXPIRES after 30 days UNLESS before that time we convince your bankruptcy judge that you meet certain conditions so that the “automatic stay” continues. See Section 362(c)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Second, if you are filing a bankruptcy case now, AND you filed TWO OR MORE previous bankruptcy cases during the one year before filing this new one, AND those two cases were dismissed, then the “automatic stay” does NOT GO INTO EFFECT AT ALL with the filing of the new case. The “automatic stay” CAN go into effect AFTER the case is filed if within 30 days of the date of filing we convince your bankruptcy judge that you meet certain conditions so that the “automatic stay” gets imposed. See Section 362(c)(4).
The details of the conditions that must be met to continue or impose the “automatic stay” in these two circumstances are beyond the scope of this blog, but they require you to establish your “good faith” about why the previous case(s) was (were) dismissed and why you filed the new one.
Some Important Practicalities
If you have never filed a bankruptcy case, or have definitely not done so in the last year, then you don’t need to worry about any of this. And even if you have, these rules don’t apply to you unless your prior case(s) was (were) dismissed. Usually you would know if you’ve had a case dismissed.
Nevertheless, keep in mind that people get unexpectedly tripped up on these rules more often than you might think. It tends to happen one of three ways:
1) A person files a bankruptcy without an attorney, gets overwhelmed by the process and doesn’t follow through, so the case gets dismissed. The person may think he or she didn’t “really” file a bankruptcy case, or may simply forget about it under the stress of the time months later when filing another case.
2) A person sees an attorney, signs some papers, and the case gets filed at court, maybe without the person fully realizing it, and then gets dismissed because he or she doesn’t follow through and doesn’t stay in touch with the attorney. Months later, while seeing another attorney or trying to file a new case without one, the person isn’t aware that he or she had filed that previous case, and/or has forgotten all about it.
3) A person’s Chapter 13 case is dismissed because changed circumstances make it impossible to make the court-approved plan payments. Months later, when creditors are causing problems again he or she files a Chapter 7 without an attorney. Not realizing that the previous Chapter 13 case ended by being dismissed, in the new case the “automatic stay” expires after 30 days, letting all his or her creditors resume all collection activity.
To Be Safe…
Prevent any of this happening to you by 1) carefully considering whether you might have somehow filed a bankruptcy case within the last year, and 2) if there’s ANY chance that you did, telling your attorney in your new case right away. If you did file a case that got dismissed, there is a good chance that your attorney will be able to persuade the bankruptcy court to impose or retain the automatic stay. But that will only happen if your attorney knows about the issue in advance and determines whether your case will meet the necessary conditions.
Posted by Kevin on March 24, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
You can file a new bankruptcy immediately after finishing another one, but why would you?
The last blog was about how long you have to wait to file a new bankruptcy case if you already filed one in the past. Those timing rules talk about both the earlier case and the subsequent case resulting in the discharge of your debts. As the last blog emphasized, if the earlier case did not result in a discharge, then you can file a second case at any time. The waiting periods do not apply.
Similarly, even after successfully completing one bankruptcy case and getting a discharge of your debts, you could file a second one at any time. You just would not be getting another discharge of your debts.
At first glance, this situation doesn’t seem to make practical sense.
Why Would You Ever Even Need a New Bankruptcy?
There are two reasons for a quick second bankruptcy.
First: you could unexpectedly incur one or more significant new debts during your bankruptcy case. Those debts could not be incorporated into that initial bankruptcy case because only debts in existence at the time of its filing can be. And you may need protection from those new debts. Since Chapter 7 cases usually last only about 3 to 4 months while Chapter 13 cases last 3 to 5 years, these interim debts are more likely to arise during the course of a Chapter 13 case. These would usually not be conventional consumer debts, because you would not likely be getting consumer credit while you’re in the middle of a bankruptcy case. Instead the new debts would tend to be unusual kinds like income taxes, perhaps student loans, obligations from a new divorce, and/or a claim against you from a vehicle accident or some other kind of liability.
Second reason for the second bankruptcy: the existence of debts that the earlier case did not write off. A Chapter 7 case could well leave still owing some income tax debt, child support arrearage, and/or student loans, for example. In some circumstances you may need the extended protection of a Chapter 13 case while you either pay or strategically avoid paying those debts, depending on which kind they are.
But What Good Is the Second Bankruptcy Without a Discharge?
Although a discharge of debts would seem to be the primary benefit of bankruptcy, it is by no means the only benefit. Instead, the “automatic stay,” protection from the collection efforts of your creditors, is sometimes benefit enough.
That’s primarily true under Chapter 13. First, the protection often extends for years instead of just the few months that it does under Chapter 7. And second, Chapter 13 provides a mechanism—the court-approved payment plan—to satisfy many of these kinds of new or non-discharged debts while under that protection.
For example, imagine that you owe a large income tax debt, plus some back child support, which were either incurred after the filing of your original bankruptcy case or were not discharged in that case. A new Chapter 13 case would essentially give you up to five years to pay those debts, usually without paying any further interest or penalties on the taxes, all the while being protected from the otherwise very aggressive collection methods of those two kinds of creditors.
But Why Not Just File a Chapter 13 Case and Avoid Filing Two Cases?
That’s a very sensible question, and usually that’s exactly what is done. Chapter 13 is quite flexible, and so a single Chapter 13 filing can usually both take care of all of your debts—the conventional one and the unusual ones like taxes and support—in one package.
But there are a variety of situations in which a single filing would not work. Sometimes you have more debt than is allowed for Chapter 13. So you first need to discharge some of the debt through Chapter 7, thereby enabling you to use Chapter 13 to take care of the taxes and such.
Or you may be contemplating or be in a divorce in which you and your spouse agree to file a Chapter 7 case together to clean up many of your debts, then leaving one of you to file the follow-up Chapter 13 case for the taxes, to cure the arrearage on a home, and any other loose ends.
Or as mentioned above, unexpected new debt could hit you during your first case, making you consider a follow-up case to buy you some continued protection.
This discussion should make very obvious that this kind of strategic planning and execution of not just one bankruptcy but two coordinated ones requires the services of a highly qualified and experienced bankruptcy attorney.
Posted by Kevin on March 11, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
You can file a new case 8 years after filing before (so, now or very soon), or possibly only 6 or 4 or 2 years after, or maybe even with no delay.
The Bankruptcy Code underwent major amendments effective October 17, 2005. Nearly two and a half million bankruptcies were filed in the year before that date, by far the most in any year-long period in history.
Today, we focus on the rules relating to the length of time required from a previous bankruptcy filing until a new one.
More precisely the timing rule refers to the amount of time from the filing of a previous bankruptcy case which resulted in the discharge of debts until the filing of another case also resulting in the discharge of debts.
“Discharge” is the legal write-off of debts provided by the bankruptcy law. It’s the main reason—but often not the only reason—for filing bankruptcy.
If you filed a previous personal bankruptcy—whether it was a Chapter 7 “straight” bankruptcy or a Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” payment plan—and your understanding is that you finished it successfully, almost certainly you received a discharge of your debts. Near the end of your case you should have received a copy of an order from the bankruptcy court granting you a discharge. If you do have your old bankruptcy documents, bring them to your present attorney. If you don’t, he or she should still be able to determine whether or not you received a discharge.
Finding this out is important because, in the unlikely event that you did not get a discharge, then you do not have to wait any period of time before you can file a new bankruptcy case. (The rare exception is if the bankruptcy court entered an order not allowing you to file a bankruptcy for a certain length of time, which only happens after serious abuse of the bankruptcy laws.)
The Timing Rules
Here is how long you must wait in between bankruptcy filings to receive a discharge of debts in a new bankruptcy case.
IF you want to now file a Chapter 7 case:
–and received a discharge in a previous Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 case, you must wait 8 years from the filing date of the previous case to the filing date of the new case;
–and received a discharge in a previous Chapter 13 case, you must wait 6 years from the filing date of the previous case to the filing date of the new case, BUT you don’t have to wait at all if in that Chapter 13 case you paid 100% of the allowed debts, or paid at least 70% and met some other conditions.
IF you want to now file a Chapter 13 case:
–and received a discharge in a previous Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 or Chapter 12 case, you must wait 4 years from the filing date of the previous case to the filing date of the new case;
–and received a discharge in a previous Chapter 13 case, you must wait 2 years from the filing date of the previous case to the filing date of the new case.
IF you want to file a Chapter 11 case, the timing rules are the same as for Chapter 7 above.
(Note that Chapter 11 is usually for a business, or for a huge amount of debt; Chapter 12 is for farmers and fishermen.)
It’s important to understand that the date the discharge was entered in the previous case does not matter. It’s the filing date that starts the clock running here.
So You Can File Soon, or Possibly Now
So, under any combination—7 to 7, 7 to 13, 13 to 7, 13 to 13, 7 to 11 etc., you can file now.
Posted by Kevin on February 12, 2015 under Bankruptcy Blog |
After filing bankruptcy, you hope you never have to do that again. But it’s good to know you can if you need to.
These next two blogs are, first today, an important recent bankruptcy history lesson, and then in the second blog, why this lesson may be quite important to you.
Filing Bankruptcy in Good Economic Times
Eight years ago, in the late winter of 2005, the U.S. economy was relatively robust. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) had increased in 2004 the most since before 9/11. In fact it would turn out that the GDP increases for 2004 and 2005, at 3.5% and 3.1% respectively, were the best from 2000 through the present.
And yet, more people filed bankruptcy in 2005 than any year in history.
The Bulge in Bankruptcy Filings 8 Years Ago
Here is a table of the total number of bankruptcy filings in the United States for the last 10 years:
| YEAR |
# OF FILINGS |
| 2003 |
1,660,245 |
| 2004 |
1,597,462 |
| 2005 |
2,078,415 |
| 2006 |
617,660 |
| 2007 |
850,912 |
| 2008 |
1,117,771 |
| 2009 |
1,473,675 |
| 2010 |
1,593,081 |
| 2011 |
1,410,653 |
| 2012 |
1,221,091 |
Notice that by far the most bankruptcies were filed in 2005. Not even in the depths of the Great Recession in 2009, 2010, and 2011 were more bankruptcies filed.
The BAPCPA Filing Bulge
The misnamed Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) is the reason for this otherwise oddly timed spike in filings. Other “Bankruptcy Reform” Acts had been kicking around Congress since 1997, and one even passed Congress in 2000 but President Clinton refused to sign that one into law. Then every year after that a similar bill was introduced but never passed, until after the 2004 Congressional elections. President Bush was re-elected to his second term and Republicans had won larger majorities in both Houses of Congress. On February 1, 2005 BAPCPA was introduced in Congress, in March the House of Representatives passed it, in April the Senate passed it, and President Bush signed it into law on April 20, 2005, with an effective date of October 17, 2005.
By the time of the results of the November 2004 election, the odds were high that some major “reform” would become law in the upcoming Congress. That became even clearer a few months later in February when the bill was introduced, so the word started going out that people who were considering filing bankruptcy should seriously consider filing before the new law went into effect. Then when the law did pass, with 6 months until its October, 2005 effective date, lots more people got the word and the rush was on to file before that date.
This filing frenzy is shown by the quarterly bankruptcy numbers during this period, with big quarterly increases from the November 2004 election until the October 2005 new law effective date, and the plummeting of filings right after:
| QUARTERS |
# OF FILINGS |
| 4th Q 2004 |
371,668 |
| 1st Q 2005 |
401,149 |
| 2nd Q 2005 |
467,333 |
| 3rd Q 2005 |
542,002 |
| 4th Q 2005 |
667,431 |
| 1st Q 2006 |
116,771 |
Notice how more bankruptcies were filed in just the 4th Quarter of 2005 than in the entire year of 2006. (See the earlier table). In fact, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, of the 667,431 bankruptcies filed in that 4th Quarter (October through December), 630,402 were filed in just the month of October. And more than 600,000 of those were filed in just the first 16 days of that October! That means that during those 16 days, the number of bankruptcy cases filed was about the same as during the entire year of 2006!
Why This Recent Bankruptcy History Matters
This history matters if you, or somebody you know, were one of those millions of people who filed bankruptcy in the run-up to BAPCPA, and because of the economic violence of the Great Recession you again need relief.
If you are one of these people, then you need to be aware of two things:
- The BAPCPA “reform” was both as bad and not as bad as feared. It is probably one of the most badly written pieces of Congressional legislation to have made it into law. It is filled with internal inconsistencies, logical conundrums, and unintended consequences. It has created infinite unnecessary headaches for millions of bankruptcy filers during its 7 and half years, as well as at every level of the federal bankruptcy court system all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. But partly because of its dreadfully bad drafting, most of the law’s changes have NOT changed the end result for most people needing bankruptcy relief. Most people filing Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy” can do so, and most of the tools of Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts” are still available for those who need them.
- If you need bankruptcy help again, you very likely either qualify now or will in the next few months. That’s the subject of the next blog.
Posted by on December 2, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Don’t assume that just because your income taxes are too new to be written off that 1) bankruptcy can’t help, or 2) only Chapter 13 can help.
Even if none of your taxes can be discharged (written-off), or most of them can’t be, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy may STILL set you up so you can deal with those taxes in a constructive way. You may not need the extra expense and time of going through a three-to-five-year Chapter 13 case.
Clean Your Slate of Other Debts So You Can Pay Your Taxes
So the simple-to-ask, maybe not-so-simple-to-answer question is whether a straight Chapter 7 bankruptcy will help you enough? More precisely, if you filed a Chapter 7 case, after it was done would you reliably be able to make large enough monthly payments to the IRS (or New Jersey) on whatever tax debt(s) that your bankruptcy would not discharge so that those taxes would be paid off safely and in a reasonable time?
“Safely” refers to the fact that you would no longer have protection from your creditors—including your tax creditor(s)—after the three months or so your Chapter 7 will usually take to complete. So after that you’d be on your own dealing with the IRS/NJ. That’s OK if you are confident that you would be able to make consistent monthly installment payments at the required amount—not just right after your bankruptcy is completed but throughout the time until it is paid off. A Chapter 7 is a good idea if you don’t need one of the most important benefits of a Chapter 13 plan as to your tax debts—the continuous protection from creditors that you get throughout the payment process. That’s especially valuable if your circumstances change and you need to lower your payments. At that point you’d probably not want to rely on the flexibility of the IRS or NJ (which can often be more rigid than the IRS).
“Reasonable time” refers to the fact that the IRS and state agencies, in almost all circumstances, will continue adding interest and penalties throughout the time you are making installment payments. Even if they are relatively flexible about stretching out the payments, you need to look at how much the ongoing interest and penalties will add to the amount you must pay before you’re done. In a Chapter 13 case, usually no more interest and penalties get tacked on once the case is filed, which can save a lot of money if you owe a fair amount of non-discharged taxes.
So how do you know whether you will be able to make tax installment payments safely enough and large enough to pay off the tax debt(s) in a reasonable time?
First, it means calculating how much a Chapter 7 case would help your monthly cash flow and your longer term financial stability by discharging your other debts.
Second, you need to know what the IRS and/or state tax authority will likely accept as monthly payments, given the amount of your remaining tax debt and other financial information. From there the amount of additional interest and penalties can roughly be calculated.
Your bankruptcy attorney will help you with these projections and calculations. He or she will then advise you about whether you are a good candidate for cleaning your slate with Chapter 7 and then paying your remaining tax debt directly.
Posted by Kevin on September 22, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy while letting go of your home can be a smart combination.
_____________________
Chapter 13—the three to five year partial payment plan—consists of an entire toolbox full of different tools to help people hang onto their homes. But that may not be what you need. After getting informed about how those tools would work (or not work) in your situation, you may decide that it’s best for you to walk away from your home. If so, here are some advantages of doing that in conjunction with filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy:
- Have more control over when you leave:
If you have a foreclosure sale date scheduled, or a foreclosure lawsuit pending, usually you would have no say about when you have to leave. You could even be forcibly evicted by county sheriff deputies. However, if you file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, that will delay the foreclosure sale or lawsuit, at least for a few weeks, and possibly for a matter of months. That alone could save you a couple thousand dollars in rent. Also, after a bankruptcy filing, your mortgage lender may well be willing to negotiate a departure date convenient to you, in return for avoiding their need to rack up a lot of attorney fees. As part of the deal you may be willing to sign over your title through a “deed in lieu of foreclosure,” with no risk of further liability since your bankruptcy case is discharging any remaining debt.
- Avoid house-related debt following you:
Depending on your situation, and on your local state laws, after surrendering a house without bankruptcy you risk being saddled with debts coming at you from various directions. Sometimes you could be liable for any deficiency on the first mortgage. Surrendering your house to a first mortgagee does not take you off the hook on a second mortgage. You could also be liable on other debts related to the home—such as unpaid utilities, contractor liens, property tax liens, or homeowner association dues. Many of these debts would be discharged if you filed a bankruptcy.
- Have an attorney in your corner:
Fair or unfair, your mortgage lender will likely treat you better when it knows you are being advised and represented by an attorney (assuming that you would be filing your Chapter 7 case through an attorney). You will have the peace of mind that comes from knowing your rights, understanding what will happen when, and having an advocate available to get directly involved as needed.
- Get a fresh financial start instead of a continuation of a vicious cycle:
If you are surrendering your house and reducing your monthly cost of keeping a roof over your head, you may be tempted to think you don’t need a bankruptcy. Perhaps you don’t. But if you have fallen so far behind on you mortgage that it’s gotten to the point of foreclosure, the odds are that you need more help than giving up your house alone will achieve. You at least owe it to yourself to get legal advice about your financial situation and your realistic options. You can then be pro-active to turn your situation around rather than waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Think about it
Posted by Kevin on July 5, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 7 bankruptcy can often also wipe judgment liens off the title to your home.
_________________________
Liens against your property—such as the lienholder’s lien on your car or truck title, or your home lender’s trust deed on your home’s title—generally are not wiped out with a bankruptcy filing. The bankruptcy discharge (write-off) of debts ends your personal liability on that debt but does not end a creditor’s rights in any collateral. Accordingly, a judgment lien—the lien that attaches to your home if a creditor gets a judgment against you—gives the judgment creditor certain rights to your home, including often the right to foreclose on it. But under some circumstances judgment liens CAN be wiped away, or voided, during bankruptcy, so that the creditor would have no such further rights against your home.
_________________________
If you still want to make good on your promise to take charge of your financial life, this and the next few blogs may help. They are about less familiar benefits of filing bankruptcy, starting with some less familiar benefits of Chapter 7.
The Chapter 7 version of bankruptcy usually achieves two main goals—it stops all or most of your creditors from collecting against you and your assets, and it “discharges,” meaning it legally forever wipes out, all or most of your debts. In most cases, that’s pretty much what it does for you, and that’s often just what you need. In contrast, Chapter 13—the “adjustment of debts” payment plan—is the creative, lots-of-tools-in-the-toolbox version of bankruptcy, often significantly better for dealing with complicated situations. But Chapter 13 takes at least 3 years compared to as short as 3 months for Chapter 7, it costs at least 3 or 4 times more, and is less likely to be completed successfully.
So here’s a tool which is available under Chapter 7—getting rid of certain judgment liens on your home. Here are the conditions for this to happen:
- You must qualify for and claim a homestead exemption on the real estate upon which you have the judgment lien.
- That lien must be a “judicial lien,” which usually means one gotten through a court judgment, but is specifically defined in the Bankruptcy Code as “a lien obtained by judgment, levy, sequestration, or other legal or equitable process or proceeding.”
- The debt underlying this judgment lien cannot be for child or spousal support, or for a mortgage foreclosure.
- The judgment lien at issue must “impair” the homestead exemption, which the law defines to mean:
- the value of all the liens on the house, including the judgment lien
- PLUS
- the amount of homestead exemption that you could claim if there were no liens on the house
- MUST BE MORE THAN
- the value of the house (assuming you are its sole owner).
So for example, if:
- the judgment lien is $20,000 and your mortgage is $150,000
- PLUS
- your available homestead exemption is $30,000
- that $20,000 judgment lien would be impairing the homestead exemption and could be voided in bankruptcy
- as long as your house was worth less than $200,000.
Lastly, please understand that merely filing the Chapter 7 bankruptcy will discharge the underlying debt that caused the judgment and its lien. But voiding the judgment lien itself takes an extra step. In NJ that means filing a motion and obtaining an order or else the judgment lien will continue to exist against your home. Also, that motion to void the judgment lien needs to be filed while your Chapter 7 case is still open and active, which usually means within about 90 days after your case is filed. Finally, lawyers usually charge a bit more than the ordinary flat fee for providing this service since it entails additional work.
So, if you own a home, find out if you have a judgment lien against the title. If you do, talk to a bankruptcy attorney about whether that lien could be voided in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. If so, gaining this very important extra protection for your home could make filing bankruptcy that much more beneficial for you.
Posted by Kevin on April 11, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 7 sometimes doesn’t help you enough with certain debts. Included are some income taxes, child and spouse support you’re behind on, home mortgage arrearage, and vehicle loans, among others.
There are times when filing a straight Chapter 7 case will help you enough by writing off your other debts so that you have the practical means to take care of the remaining special debt(s). It frees up money. But other times you need the extra protection that a Chapter 13 payment plan gives you.
_________________________
Here are the ways Chapter 7 could help with the first three of the special kinds of debts mentioned above, and ways that Chapter 13 can help more if necessary. The fourth kind—vehicle loans—are in some respects more complicated, so they’ll be addressed separately in an upcoming blog.
Income Taxes
Some income taxes can be discharged (written off) in bankruptcy, including under Chapter 7, but some can’t, generally more recent ones. If you have a tax debt that will not be discharged, but is the only debt that will not be and is small enough, you can file a Chapter 7 case and make payment arrangements directly with the IRS (or applicable state tax agency). If the monthly payment amount is manageable, this could well be the sensible way to go.
But if the tax amount is too large for what you can afford to pay, or you have a number of debts that would not be discharged under Chapter 7, then Chapter 13 would help in the following ways:
- You would likely get more time to pay off the tax.
- The IRS or state agency would be prevented from taking collection action without permission of the bankruptcy court.
- Generally you would not need to pay interest and penalties from the time your case is filed, allowing you to pay off the tax debt with less money.
Child and Spousal Support Arrearage
State laws allow ex-spouses and support enforcement agencies to be extremely aggressive in their collection methods. Sometimes you can work out a deal with these enforcement agencies, sometimes not. If you can make a deal, then Chapter 7 may make sense for you.
But otherwise you need the extraordinary power of Chapter 13. It gives you three to five years to pay the support current, as long as you rigorously keep up with your ongoing monthly payments in the meantime. And throughout this time all of the very tough collection tools usually available to your ex-spouse or support agency are put on hold for your benefit.
Home Mortgage Arrearage
If you are behind on your home mortgage but want to keep the home, and you file a Chapter 7 case, you are at the mercy of your mortgage company about how much time you will have to catch up on the mortgage.
In contrast, similarly to what is stated above, Chapter 13 will give you three to five years to cure that arrearage. So, if you are too far behind to be able to catch up within the time you would be given under Chapter 7, then you need to file under Chapter 13.
Posted by Kevin on April 4, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
To qualify for Chapter 13, you must be an “individual with regular income, meaning that your income is sufficiently stable and regular to enable you to make payments under a Chapter 13 plan. That requirement of a “stable and regular” income means not only at the time of filing, but for the entire duration of the plan (36 to 60 months). In a way, every Chapter 13 is a leap in faith that the debtor’s financial situation will be stable (or better) through the duration of the plan. Of course, life throws you curve balls. You lose a job, or your hours are cut. You or a member of your family gets sick and insurance does not cover the whole bill. The car breaks down-more than once. Your wife has to quit her job to take care of her sick mother. Whatever. The Code takes this into account. How? One way is by allowing you to convert your Chapter 13 to a Chapter 7.
Here’s an example to illustrate this. You own a home and have two mortgages. You are $5,000 behind in payments on your first mortgage (balance $250,000) and cannot remember when you last paid the second (balance of $75,000). You owe $25,000 in credit card bills, and another $10,000 in medical expenses that the insurance did not cover. The home is worth a less than the first mortgage. You had been laid off, but got a new job, and are starting to get significant overtime. But now, almost miraculously the debt collectors are calling again. You are making enough to take care of that first mortgage, your current expenses, and if everyone tightens belts, a little more, say $250 per month.
Chapter 13 may be the answer. How, you say. Even if everything goes right, what am I going to do about that second mortgage? Chapter 13 gives you the power to “strip” the second mortgage; that is, convert the second mortgage secured debt into unsecured debt. Then, the second mortgage gets paid pro rata with the credit cards and medical bills. How much? What ever is left over after paying your current monthly bills, your first mortgage arrearages, and the fee to your lawyer and the trustee. Could be very little. Plus the “second mortgage strip” also lowers the debt against the home by the amount of that second mortgage, bringing the debt down closer to the home’s market value. Seems to satisfy both your short term and long term goals. Chapter 13 looks good, so you file under that chapter. You know it is going to be a bit of a stretch, but if the stars line up right, you get to keep your home and discharge your debts.
15 months into the plan, your boss cuts back on most of your overtime. You can’t even pay the first mortgage much less the trustee. If the case is dismissed, there is no more automatic stay so your creditors will come after you because you now have wages that can be garnished. What to do?
The Bankruptcy Code explicitly states in that a Chapter 13 debtor may convert a case under this chapter to a case under chapter 7 at any time. Any waiver of the right to convert under this subsection is unenforceable.
Not a perfect solution, by any means. However, better than being thrown to the wolves. Let’s look at the scenario under the converted Chapter 7. First, you do not have to make any more payments to the trustee. That comes out to $3000 per year. Second, your Chapter 7 case is over in about 3 months and you most probably get a discharge. That means that you have knocked out all your debts (mortgage, credit card and medical).
BUT, the Code differentiates between the debt and the security for the debt. The debt is discharged but the security (mortgage) remains on the property. Unless you can make a deal with the mortgagees, you will probably lose your home. But you will not owe any deficiency on the first mortgage or anything on the second. Moreover, you will knock out the credit card and medical debt.
Now, if you work with experienced bankruptcy counsel, he or she will lay out this scenario in a way that you know or should know that you are taking a “shot” to save your home. If it works, God bless. If not, you switch into a 7, get your discharge and move on with your life.
So conversion to Chapter 7 can be a decent result when the goals of Chapter 13 cannot be met, either because of unexpected circumstances or because the debtors took some calculated risks which did not go their way.
