Posted by Kevin on March 25, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog | 
One advantage of filing a Chapter 13 case is that you can get out of it “at any time.”
Chapter 13 comes with a right to dismiss. This means that at any point of your case you can get out of the case and out of the bankruptcy system altogether. Since this type of bankruptcy generally takes three to five years to complete, and involves projecting your income and expense that far out into the future, you’re only being sensible to ask what happens if your financial circumstances change during that period.
There are a number of other options for dealing with changes in your income and expenses, such as making adjustments in your Chapter 13 plan, or converting your case into a Chapter 7 one. There’s even something called a “hardship discharge” which in limited circumstances allows you to complete your case early. We’ll look at these other options in future blogs.
Dismissing your case is probably the most extreme of all the options. But it can be the best one in some situations.
If you dismiss your case, here are some of the main consequences:
- Once the bankruptcy judge signs the order dismissing your case, you no longer need to make payments under the Chapter 13 plan, and neither the court nor the Chapter 13 trustee has any further jurisdiction over your income, your tax refunds, or anything else addressed in your Chapter 13 plan.
- You lose the immediate benefit of being in a bankruptcy case, the “automatic stay” preventing your creditors from collecting on their debts and repossessing or foreclosing on any collateral. So before dismissing your case, be sure you know how each of your creditors is likely to act in response to the dismissal.
- Because under Chapter 13 you do not get a discharge of your debts until successful completion of the case, if you dismiss your case you will owe all your creditors as before except to the extent that they received payments during the case. Most interest and penalties stopped during the Chapter 13 case will usually be able to be added onto your debts, including for the period of time that you were in the case.
So why would somebody ever want to dismiss their Chapter 13 case? Simply because in some situations the advantages of dismissal outweigh any disadvantages. Chapter 13 cases can take such different forms and be filed for so many different reasons that it’s impossible to give a neat and tidy answer to this. So here is one scenario that illustrates when a dismissal can be the best choice.
Assume that a single mom with a young child has a vehicle loan, a home mortgage, and owes back income taxes. During a period of 10 months of unemployment she had managed to keep current on her vehicle loan because that was her absolutely highest priority. But while she was unemployed she could only do this and still take care of her necessary living expenses by not paying her mortgage. So she fell behind 10 payments of $1,500, or a total of $15,000. She also owed $2,000 to the IRS for the prior year’s income taxes because of not paying any withholding on her unemployment benefits. So she filed a Chapter 13 case a year ago in order to have three years both to catch up on that $15,000 mortgage arrearage and to pay off the income tax. She continued paying the vehicle loan so she’s still current on that.
But now she got a job offer in a neighboring state, where her parents live, who could help raise her child. So she’s ready to surrender the home to the mortgage company, and under the terms of her mortgage she would owe them nothing if she did so. The income from her new job would be enough to allow her to continue making her vehicle payments, and to set up an installment payment plan with the IRS to pay off the tax debt outside of bankruptcy. With her changed circumstances, and all her creditors taken care of, a dismissal of her Chapter 13 case would be appropriate and the best option here.
Posted by Kevin on February 20, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
You have some wiggle room if you either want to get out of your bankruptcy case or change to the other Chapter.
_________________________
After starting your bankruptcy case, your circumstances could suddenly change or for some other reason you may no longer want to be in the bankruptcy case that you’re in. Getting out of the bankruptcy court altogether—dismissing your case—is not very easy in a Chapter 7 case, easier in a Chapter 13 one. Changing from one Chapter to the other—converting the case–is usually allowed. We start today with some reasons why you might want to dismiss or convert, and then in the next two blogs talk about dismissal and conversion first under Chapter 7 and then under Chapter 13.
_________________________
Why Dismiss or Convert?
To put this into context, what types of situations would lead to a person to want to get out of a bankruptcy case after presumably giving the decision a lot of thought beforehand?
Although some situations could apply to both Chapter 7 and 13, these two procedures are very different in two very practical ways so that the situations that would motivate you to get out of the case tend to be different. The two big differences are their length and likelihood of successful completion:
• most Chapter 7 cases usually lasts only about three months, compared to three to five years for a successful Chapter 13 case; and
• most Chapter 7 cases are completed successfully (at least those where the debtors are represented by an attorney), while a significant percentage of Chapter 13 cases are not.
Why Would You Want to Dismiss or Convert Under Chapter 7?
Under Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy,” there’s a lot less that can go wrong and a lot less time for your circumstances to change. The focus is on your assets and debts at a fixed moment in time, at the point your case is filed. So if a careful analysis of your financial situation at that time indicates that your case meets the requirements of Chapter 7, not much should change that.
Here are some problems that can nevertheless arise making you wish you could get out of your Chapter 7 case:
• Although assets are fixed as of the date of filing, under Section 541(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, if a relative dies within 180 days of the filing of your case leaving you as the beneficiary of an inheritance or a life insurance policy, that inheritance or insurance proceed becomes available to pay your creditors.
• If shortly after filing your case you have an accident and incur significant new medical debts because of having insufficient medical insurance, the new debt cannot be included and discharged in your case because that debt did not exist when your case was filed.
• You may be unaware at the time your case is filed that you have a legal right to a valuable asset, for example you did not know that your parents’ vacation home had been secretly deeded to you and your siblings.
Why Would You Want to Dismiss or Convert Under Chapter 13?
Under Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts bankruptcy,” there’s a lot more going on and so a lot more that can go wrong than in a Chapter 7 case. A Chapter 13 plan lays out how much and when the various creditors will be paid (if at all), and creditors can object to the plan and sometimes force it to be changed before it’s approved by the bankruptcy judge. Then you have to comply with the terms of the plan, over the course of three to five years, which give a lot of time for your circumstances to change. The focus is on your financial life not at a fixed moment in time but rather throughout the years of your case. Your Chapter 13 plan usually assumes that your income and expenses will stay the same, or else sometimes tries to predict how they will change into the future. Either way, those assumptions come with risk.
So all kinds of things can happen which could make you wish you could get out of your Chapter 13 case, but here are some representative examples:
• Your plan is designed around your desire to save your home, but a year or so later you find a job which requires you to move, taking away the primary purpose of your case.
• You filed a joint Chapter 13 case with your spouse, but two years later you go through a divorce, totally changing your financial life.
• Your income is significantly reduced permanently; so much so that even amending your Chapter 13 plan is not feasible, making you no longer eligible for Chapter 13.
• Your income is significantly increased a year into your case; so much so that you become obligated to amend your plan to pay most or all of your debt.
Again, the next two blogs will be about getting out of Chapter 7 and then Chapter 13, in situations like the examples given above.
Posted by Kevin on February 3, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Each spouse in a marriage with significant tax debts has his or her self-interest, which may need a different solution than the other spouse.
_________________________
Married couples can and often file bankruptcy together. Doing so when they both owe substantial income taxes may especially makes sense. But each spouse needs to understand his and her own rights and options before deciding whether to file bankruptcy or not, and if so whether to join in the other’s bankruptcy or file his or her own case.
_________________________
If a couple owes a lot of income taxes, often it is because of the actions of one of spouses—such as one spouse running a business into which that spouse puts his or her heart and soul but still eventually failed. The spouse who is “at fault” may well be feeling deep frustration and guilt, while the other spouse is experiencing feelings of anger, disappointment, and even betrayal. This extra source of conflict can not only make their situation more emotionally challenging but legally as well.
This blog suggests some principles to consider if you’re in a similar situation.
The Two Spouses Each Have Their Own Self Interest
To state what is probably obvious, just because two people are married does not mean that their financial situations are the same, or that their legal problems and the potential solutions are the same. While some spouses do have close to identical situations—if they are jointly liable on all the same debts and share ownership in all their assets—often that’s not the case. Each person can have his or her own separate debts and to some degree his or her own assets, making their financial situations very different. And beyond those tangible differences, each person can have different goals and different attitudes about how to deal with his or her individual problems and their ones in common.
Because income taxes are such an unusual debt, they can greatly complicate the self-interest of each spouse. Taxes are unusual in how they are incurred. For example, a tax debt can arise primarily out of the actions of one of the spouses, with the other spouse becoming completely liable by simply signing a joint tax return. That spouse might eventually be able to get out of that liability through the “innocent spouse” exception, another complication not available with any other kind of debt. Taxes are also quite unusual in how they are treated in bankruptcy. There are relatively complicated rules about what taxes will and will not be discharged, and how each portion of each tax account can be handled under Chapter 13.
Each nuance of these rules can create different self-interests for each spouse.
The Two Spouses May Each Need Their Own Bankruptcy
The two spouses’ different self-interests may well lead to different solutions. Sometimes that may mean one person filing bankruptcy and the other not, or one person filing a Chapter 7 case and the other a Chapter 13 one.
The Two Spouses Could Need Separate Attorneys
Without getting deeply into delicate attorneys’ ethical rules about conflict of interest, attorneys need to be careful about simultaneously representing any two people who have different interests. This is true regardless if these two people are married and have some common interests. In the end the two may end up filing a joint bankruptcy because it is in their individual and mutual best interest to do so. But before getting there each person must be made fully aware of his or her individual rights and legal options, whether this happens through two separate attorneys or through a single one. One or both spouses may decide to sacrifice some of their individual interests for their common good, but can only do so when their rights and options have been clearly laid out for each of them.
Posted by Kevin on January 25, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Finding the best way out of this seeming Catch-22 depends on a full understanding of your unique situation and your goals.
_________________________
The last blog explained that filing a bankruptcy by yourself immediately protects YOU from IRS collection activity but does NOT protect your spouse. Similarly the legal write-off (“discharge”) of any tax applies to the person(s) filing the bankruptcy but not to your spouse if he or she does not either join you in your bankruptcy case or else files his or her own case.
That makes perfect sense—you don’t get the benefit of bankruptcy if you don’t file bankruptcy! So the simple solution is for spouses to file bankruptcy together. But there are many situations where that’s not so simple. The next few blogs discuss some of the practical problems that can arise, and how to resolve them.
_________________________
One Spouse Has Most of the Debts, the Other May Have Assets
Often one spouse is the only one individually liable on most of the debt. Or one spouse is solely liable on all debt except they are jointly liable on the secured debts—their mortgage and/or vehicle loans–that the couple intend to keep paying on. These situations can happen when one spouse incurred all the debt from operating a business that failed, or that spouse was simply the primary income source, and/or the one with good credit.
In these situations only the spouse whose debts would be discharged would directly benefit from a bankruptcy filing, so the other is appropriately reluctant to be in a bankruptcy that appears to provide him or her no benefit.
But now add two more ingredients to this scenario: 1) a large personal income tax debt that is old enough and meets the other conditions so that it can be discharged in bankruptcy, which both spouses owe because they both signed the joint tax return; and 2) a significant asset not protected by the applicable exemption owned separately by the spouse with less debts. To make this clearer, let’s say the income tax debt is $25,000 for the 2008 tax year, and the one spouse’s separate asset is his or her share in the childhood vacation home, inherited before the marriage, with this spouse’s share being worth about $20,000.
Seeming Catch-22 for Spouse with Less Debt but Liable on Tax Debt
Without the joint income tax debt, the spouse with little or no other dischargeable debt would not want to join in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case because his or her share of the old family vacation home could well be claimed by the bankruptcy trustee and sold to pay the couple’s creditors. But with the existence of the joint tax debt, a Chapter 7 filed by the other spouse alone would forever discharge that tax debt as to THAT spouse only, leaving the non-filing spouse owing all of the tax—and the continually accruing interest and penalties—by him- or herself. Clearly not a good result.
Indeed the situation on the surface looks like a Catch-22: the asset-owning spouse either joins in on the bankruptcy thus jeopardizes the asset, or else doesn’t join and is stuck with the tax.
Best Solution Depends on the Unique Facts of the Case
It’s in these tough situations that an experienced bankruptcy attorney becomes very valuable. Determining the best solution depends on thorough understanding of the law along with a careful analysis of all the facts of this case—such as whether the couple owed any other taxes and if so how much and for which years, whether they owed any other “priority” debts (including back child or spousal support payments from a prior marriage, or employee wages from the failed business), their current income and expenses, and lots of other potentially relevant facts.
Posted by Kevin on January 6, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Filing bankruptcy with or without your spouse affects the discharge of debts you each receive, and also affects whether you file under Chapter 7 or 13.
_________________________
Continuing from the last blog:
- There are consequences to filing separately or together, consequences affecting:
- the discharge of your debts.
_________________________
The last blog was about what happens to a spouse who doesn’t file bankruptcy when the other spouse does, specifically as to the “automatic stay,” the immediate protection from creditor collection activity. In a nutshell, there is NO protection from joint creditors for the non-filing spouse in Chapter 7, while there IS some important but limited protection in Chapter 13 through the “co-debtor stay.”
The “automatic stay” is temporary protection that goes into effect at the beginning of and can last the length of the case. The “discharge”—the permanent legal write-off of a debt which is the topic of today’s blog—happens at the end of either a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case.
Debts Are Individual
A debt is an individual liability. Discharging a debt in bankruptcy is not so much a destruction of that debt as a legal pronouncement that an individual is no longer liable on that debt.
Each person owes a debt individually—we are not automatically liable for our spouse’s debts. So if ALL of a couple’s debts are owed by one spouse and only that spouse, then a bankruptcy by that spouse will leave the couple with no debts (assuming the debts are of the kind that can be discharged).
Chapter 7 Discharges Debts Only of the Filing Spouse(s)
Much more common is the situation in which two spouses each have some individual debts and some joint debts.
If they file a JOINT Chapter 7 straight bankruptcy, at the completion of the case their debts will be discharged (legally written off). That includes debts that each spouse owes individually, as well as those for which they are both legally liable.
If only ONE of two spouses files a Chapter 7 case, only that spouse’s debts will be discharged. That includes debts that only that spouse owes individually, as well as his or her obligation on any debts owed jointly with his or her spouse. But the non-filing spouse’s debts will not be discharged. And that includes debts that only that spouse owes individually, as well as his or her obligation on any debts owed jointly with his or her spouse.
Distinguishing Individual and Joint Debts
What this means is that one spouse should not file without the other unless they know exactly how much debt the non-filing spouse is legally liable for—both his or her separate debt and their joint debt.
This is not always obvious. A seemingly non-liable spouse can in fact be legally liable on a debt in numerous possible ways. A creditor’s monthly bill that is addressed to only one spouse does not necessarily mean that the other spouse did not sign and become obligated under the original loan agreement. Under certain states’ laws a spouse is obligated for the other spouse’s debts under certain circumstances. Also, specific creditors—such as the IRS—are favored with special laws creating liability for the other spouse. So both spouses’ debts need to be reviewed carefully to see who is liable on each contractually and as a matter of law.
There’s No “Co-Debtor Discharge” in Chapter 13
There is no discharge of a non-filing spouse’s liability analogous to the special “co-debtor stay” of Chapter 13. The filing spouse has the opportunity to protect the non-filing spouse during the course of the 3-to-5-year Chapter 13 case through the “co-debtor stay,” but if the debt is not paid in full during the case then the creditor can pursue the non-filing spouse once the case is over. That’s true even though the filing spouse’s liability for the same debt is discharged at the end of that Chapter 13 case.
Take as an example a husband and wife owing $5,000 on a credit card that they both thought only the husband was liable on because they understood it was tied to his business that failed. They’d forgotten that long ago they had both signed the credit card application. If only the husband files a Chapter 13 case, the “co-debtor stay” would immediately prevent the credit card creditor from pursuing the wife. That creditor may not bother to object to the “co-debtor stay.” Then at the end of the husband’s Chapter 13 case, any of his remaining liability on that credit card debt (beyond whatever portion was paid through his plan, if any) would be discharged, and his case completed and closed. That would terminate the “co-debtor stay,” allowing the creditor to pursue the wife for the full $5,000 debt (less any payments made in the Chapter 13 plan), plus years of interest and late charges.
The Bottom Line
Be very cautious about filing a separate bankruptcy case—Chapter 7 or 13—without your spouse. Discuss your debts thoroughly with your attorney, getting strong verification that the non-filing spouse is liable neither contractually nor by operation of law on debts. Use the “co-debtor stay” to protect the non-filing spouse on a limited joint debt(s), but only to give the filing spouse time to pay off the debt(s) in full so that there is no surviving liability at the end of the Chapter 13 case for which the non-filing spouse would continue to be liable.
Posted by Kevin on December 27, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Filing bankruptcy with or without your spouse affects the protection from creditors each of you receives, and also affects whether you file under Chapter 7 or 13.
_________________________
Continuing from the last month’s blog:
- There are consequences to filing separately or together, consequences affecting:
- protection from your creditors’ collection activity.
_________________________
Bankruptcy Only Protects Bankruptcy Filers, Right?
Start with the sensible proposition that if you want bankruptcy protection from your creditors, you need to file bankruptcy to get it. Sounds obvious and sensible, but it’s only partly true.
It’s True in Chapter 7
If you file a Chapter 7 straight bankruptcy case by yourself—without your spouse—and one of your debts is owed by both you and your spouse, the creditor will be able to continue pursuing your spouse to pay that debt. That’s because the “automatic stay” which stops creditors from collecting debts immediately upon the filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy only protects the person who files. The section of the federal Bankruptcy Code which provides for the “automatic stay” says that it stops “any act to collect… a claim against the debtor.” And a “debtor” is a person who has filed a bankruptcy case.
So if your spouse did not join in your bankruptcy case (and didn’t file his or her separate case), nothing stops this spouse’s creditors from pursuing the debts owed by him or her. And that includes debts that the two of you owe jointly. That’s the simple reason that usually married folks file joint bankruptcies—besides any individual debts each may have, most spouses have joint debts which both spouses need protection from.
But Chapter 13 Could Protect a Non-Filing Spouse
Bankruptcy CAN protect a co-obligor, such as a spouse, in a limited but potentially crucial way, ONLY under Chapter 13. The “co-debtor stay” of Chapter 13 extends the “automatic stay” immediately upon the filing of the case not just to the filing “debtor” but to also to co-debtors—any individual that is liable on a consumer debt with the debtor. A spouse who does not join the other spouse’s bankruptcy filing is a protected by this “co-debtor stay” as to any of their joint consumer debts.
But this protection comes with conditions. If the creditor challenges the co-debtor stay as to the non-filing spouse, the bankruptcy court will allow the creditor to pursue him or her EXCEPT to the extent the filing spouse is paying that debt through the Chapter 13 case. So the filing spouse can fully protect the non-filing spouse by arranging through the Chapter 13 plan to pay that debt in full. That way the debt is slowly paid off during the 3-to-5-year plan while both are protected from collections—the filing spouse by the “automatic stay” and the non-filing spouse by the “co-debtor stay.” Chapter 13 debtors are generally allowed to favor such consumer joint debts in their plans over other non-joint debts in order to protect co-debtor. So if the amount of such joint debt is relatively modest, this can be a way for only one spouse to file bankruptcy and still protect the other spouse from a joint creditor or two.
Since the “co-debtor stay” is available only under Chapter 13, if there are good reasons for only one spouse to file bankruptcy, and both spouses are liable on a limited amount of consumer debt, then Chapter 13 could well be the better option.
Posted by Kevin on November 6, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
The Cast of Characters
You—the Debtor
A Chapter 7 debtor is looked at quite differently from a Chapter 13 debtor. Focusing here on one main difference, Chapter 7 fixates on who you are financially at the moment your case is filed. Chapter 13 focuses not only on that moment, but also who you are financially for the next the three to five years (the length of your payment plan).
For example, if you started earning a higher income a year after your case is filed, that would have no effect if you had filed a Chapter 7 case. But in a Chapter 13 case, that income increase would likely increase what you’d have to pay your creditors. On the other hand, because Chapter 7 pretty much doesn’t get involved in your future, it also doesn’t protect your future income from certain potentially dangerous debts which are not written off, such as certain taxes and child and spousal support arrearage. Chapter 13 does protect such future income. It allows you to pay these kinds of special debts based on your budget instead of leaving you at the mercy of those creditors’ aggressive collection powers.
Your Primary Challenger—the Trustee
In both Chapters 7 and 13, most likely the person you would have the most contact with would be the trustee. They are carefully selected and supervised individuals who are assigned to your case to take care of certain tasks. I called them your “challengers” because that’s their primary job, but most of the time your attorney and you will work cooperatively with them.
The Chapter 7 trustee’s most important task is to determine whether or not he or she has the right to take anything from you—in other word whether everything that you own is “exempt,” meaning that you can keep it all, as is usually the case. The Chapter 13 trustee’s two primary tasks are to raise any appropriate challenges to your proposed payment plan, and then, once a plan is approved by the bankruptcy judge, to distribute to creditors payments that you make under that plan.
Your Adversaries—the Creditors
Under both Chapter 7 and 13, your creditors can play a major role but often don’t. They can challenge your ability to discharge (write-off) their debts, and can raise a variety of objections. Often, we don’t hear from them at all, but if we do it’s usually a secured creditor (one who has a right to collateral such as your home or vehicle) or a special “priority” creditor—a taxing authority or support enforcement agency. How the various kinds of creditors are handled in Chapter 7 vs. 13 will be discussed in future blogs.
The Enforcer—the U.S. Trustee
This is an office under the U.S. Department of Justice which administers and, to a large degree, oversees the whole system, including the Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 trustees. You will usually not hear directly from them, and if you do it’s usually not good news, indicating that you or your paperwork are not following the rules.
The Paper-Pusher—the Bankruptcy Clerk
This is the office where we file the bankruptcy documents (which is virtually all done electronically, not by paper being physically delivered anywhere). They send out the official bankruptcy court notices.
The Deciders—the Bankruptcy Judges
A bankruptcy judge is assigned to every Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 case, but mostly they work behind the scenes. You will almost never actually go to the judge’s courtroom in a Chapter 7 case, and seldom in a Chapter 13 case.
In most Chapter 7 cases, a judge is hardly involved, except in signing the discharge order releasing you from your debts at the completion of your case, assuming that it proceeded appropriately. In the relatively unusual situation of a creditor objecting to the discharge of its debt, the bankruptcy judge will decide whether the objection meets the relatively limited grounds for a debt not to be discharged.
In contrast, a judge is always involved in a Chapter 13 case, at the very least in the approval of your payment plan at what is called the confirmation hearing. But again, you almost never need to attend this hearing, which is taken care of by your attorney. Because of the length of a Chapter 13 case, it’s more likely than in a Chapter 7 case that issues will arise that need the judge’s attention—changes in your plan if your circumstances change, challenges by creditors or the trustee if you are not meeting the terms of your plan, and such. Chapter 13 is a 3-5 year journey that you take with the court, the trustee, your creditors and most importantly, your attorney. So a word to the wise, make your payments in a timely manner and stay in close communication with your attorney throughout your case so that you know whether issues are being put before your judge and how he or she is deciding them.
Posted by Kevin on November 3, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
In deciding between Chapter 7 and 13, get this question out of the way right away: “Can I keep everything I own if I file a Chapter 7 case?”
_________________________
Most people do not lose anything that they own when they file bankruptcy. That’s because the law protects (“exempts”) certain kinds of your assets and usually a certain dollar value of them. If everything you own fits within those kinds and those amounts, then you can file a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy” and protect everything. Even if you DO own and want to keep things beyond those limits, filing a Chapter 13 case will likely protect those additional things. So, a way to put the question is whether 1) all your possessions are protected under Chapter 7 or instead 2) you need the extra protection provided by Chapter 13.
(This blog is about things you own free and clear. Those that are collateral on debts, such as your home with its mortgage, are a whole separate discussion for later.)
_________________________
This is a good first question once you start seriously considering bankruptcy because usually your attorney will be able to answer it quite quickly and assure your possessions are protected in a Chapter 7 case. And if some are not protected, that’s an issue that should be addressed by your attorney and you from the very beginning.
Just because your attorney can usually make this determination quite quickly does not mean that it is not an important question, or that it’s an easy one for someone who isn’t highly experienced in this area of law.
It’s an important question because:
1) If you’re filing bankruptcy you likely can’t spare to lose what you own, so you don’t want to put any of it at risk.
2) You especially don’t want to lose something unnecessarily, since there usually are ways to prevent that from happening.
It’s not an easy question for the inexperienced because:
1) In some states the state law determines what you can keep, while in some other states federal law does, and in others either state or federal law can apply.
2) After knowing which law applies, the asset categories are often not clearly stated in the statutes, and their meaning can turn on court interpretations or even on the informal practices of the local bankruptcy trustees or judges.
3) The laws change—the statutes, the formal court interpretations, and the informal practices, and it is very difficult to keep up with all this without working with it full time.
4) If you moved from another state, the statutes and court interpretations applicable to your former state may or may not apply.
And if everything you own is NOT protected, then Chapter 13 MAY be a great tool for keeping everything. But here are some good questions to ask your attorney in this situation:
1) Are the substantial extra time and cost of a Chapter 13 case worth this benefit?
2) Can those unprotected assets be more efficiently protected by some appropriate pre-bankruptcy planning?
3) Can those assets be protected in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy by paying a reasonable amount to the bankruptcy trustee—in reasonable monthly payments—while avoiding the extra hassles of a Chapter 13 payment plan?
4) If you would pay such money to the trustee, where would that money go, and might at least some of it go where it would benefit you—such as to pay taxes or some other debt that you would not be written off by the Chapter 7 case so you would have to pay anyway?
5) And lastly, would Chapter 13 help you in other ways beyond protecting your assets, so that overall it would be worthwhile?
Posted by Kevin on October 30, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 13 costs much more than Chapter 7, takes about 10 times as long, so you do a Chapter 7 if possible, right?
No. These two options each have advantages and disadvantages that need to be carefully matched to your immediate and long-term goals. The greater cost of Chapter 13 sometimes is far outweighed by what you may save through that procedure—possibly even by tens of thousands of dollars. The length of Chapter 13 can itself be an advantage when you’re trying to buy time or stretch payments out over a longer period to lower their monthly amount. But in other situations, Chapter 7 may be just what you need.
Be Informed, But Be Open-Minded
It’s good to inform yourself in advance about these options. But it’s also wise to have an open mind when you first go to see an attorney for legal advice. You may simply not know about a crucial advantage or disadvantage that could swing your decision one way or the other. And you don’t want to be too emotionally invested in going in one direction when the other may be a better choice.
Easy Choice, Hard Choice
Sometimes your circumstances and/or your goals push your decision strongly in one direction or the other. Sometimes you may even only qualify for one, and that one provides what you need. Or you may qualify for both, but still everything points towards either Chapter 7 or 13. In either situation, it could be a very easy choice.
But often you could go through either a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case AND BOTH may have attractive features. So it can come down to a deeply personal choice.
For Example…
A couple of simple examples will make this clearer.
If you are behind on your home mortgage and want to hang onto the home, a Chapter 7 case would likely write off all or most of your other debts. Then you’d likely have a few months to catch up on the mortgage. In contrast, a Chapter 13 case would give you up to 5 years to catch up. And it may allow you to avoid paying a second mortgage. This choice turns to some degree on factual issue like whether you have a second mortgage that could be “avoided,” and how much you’re behind on the mortgage payments. But on a personal level it comes down on how important it is to you to keep the house, and how much you’d be willing to bet that you’d be able to do that though Chapter 7 by negotiating a relatively quick catch-up of payments instead of getting much more time and far greater protection through Chapter 13.
Similarly, if you owed some recent income taxes that would not be written off under either Chapter, you could file a Chapter 7 case and write off all or most of your other debts so that you could focus your financial resources on the IRS. You’d arrange with the IRS to make monthly payments to pay off that tax debt, plus ongoing interest and penalties. Or you could file a Chapter 13 case and pay those taxes through a formal plan based on your own budget, usually avoiding additional interest and penalties, all the while being protected from the IRS. But you would pay extra fees for these advantages. This choice also depends on the facts, such as how much tax you owe and how much you would be able afford to pay each month once your Chapter 7 case were completed. But then it comes down to the more personal question of how confident you’d be that your present income and expenses would stay stable throughout the repayment period, so that you could make those payments no matter what.
It’s Good to Have a Choice, Even If It’s Not an Easy One
To be honest, it is not unusual for people to have some factors pointing towards Chapter 7 with others pointing towards Chapter 13. But instead of wringing your hands about having tough choices, realize it is usually a good thing to have more than one choice, even if neither is perfect. An experienced, conscientious attorney will walk you through this, help you prioritize your goals, weigh any risks, and give you what you need so that you can confidently make a smart choice.
Coming Right Up…
Because being informed is a good thing, and because this decision between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 is so important, the next few blogs will look at both the basic and some more subtle differences between them.
Posted by Kevin on October 28, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Why Does Chapter 13 Have Debt Limits?
Chapter 7 has no debt limit. But the Bankruptcy Code does impose a limit on the amount of debt that person can owe when filing a Chapter 13 case. Why? Although in conventional consumer situations an average Chapter 7 case is much quicker and easier than an average Chapter 13 case, in fact Chapter 7 can be used with a wide variety of business and consumer arenas, including for corporations and partnerships, including those with many millions of dollars of debt. Chapter 13 is a tremendously flexible procedure, but it is still a relatively streamlined one—especially compared to Chapter 11 reorganization. It was specifically designed for individuals and married couples with relatively straightforward debts.
The primary way that the law tries to limit Chapter 13 to simpler cases is with debt limits. Currently the individual filing one, or the married couple filing together, must have less than $383,175 in total unsecured debts and ALSO less than $1,149,525 in secured debts.
What’s with the Odd Amounts?
These dollar limits do sound arbitrary, and to some extent they are, simply reflecting a Congressional compromise going back 34 years to the original passage of the Bankruptcy Code in 1978. The limits back then were only $100,000 unsecured debt and $350,000 secured debt. These didn’t change until more than doubling in 1994 to $250,000 and $750,000, respectively, with inflationary increases every three years thereafter. The current amounts have been in effect since April 1, 2013.
What Are “Noncontingent, Liquidated Debts”?
The statute specifically says that you “may be a debtor under Chapter 13” only if you owe, “on the date of the filing of the petition, noncontingent, liquidated, unsecured debts of less than $383,175 and noncontingent, liquidated, secured debts of less than $1,149,525” (with the appropriate current amounts inserted).
To be a bit over simplistic, these two descriptive words are intended to make clear that only real debts count for these limits. “Noncontingent” means that you are presently liable on the debt, not liable only if some event does or does not occur. “Liquidated” means that you owe a specific and determinable amount. A contingent debt would include one that you would only owe if somebody else did not pay it. A noncontingent debt would be one which you owe jointly with someone else but the creditor has no obligation to first pursue the other debtor. An unliquidated debt would include a lawsuit against you for unspecified damages; a liquidated debt could be a lawsuit where the alleged debt amount can be determined, even if it might be disputed.
Conclusion
In most cases, you will either be clearly under both secured and unsecured debt limits or clearly over one of them. But if you are at all close, be aware that these “noncontingent, unliquidated” distinctions are not always clear. And even if you are over the limits, there may be other solutions if you really need the benefits of a Chapter 13. One possibility is filing a so-called “Chapter 20”—filing a Chapter 7 case to discharge much of your debts, followed immediately by filing a Chapter 13 (7 + 13 = 20). The Chapter 7 discharge should get you under the Chapter 13 debt limits, and then although the Chapter 13 cannot discharge any more debts, it could well protect you from your remaining creditors as you pay their debts—such as mortgage arrearage, back child support, or taxes—at your own schedule.
Posted by Kevin on October 19, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you don’t qualify for either Chapter 7 or 13, do you have to do a very expensive Chapter 11 reorganization?
Chapter 11 is dreadfully expensive. That’s part of the reason why consumers seldom file them compared to Chapter 7 and 13. The court filing fee alone is $1,233 . The attorney fees can be tens of thousands of dollars. Why so expensive? Because Chapter 11 was designed for large corporate reorganizations, and, in spite of efforts to streamline it for smaller businesses and for individuals, it’s a cumbersome, attorney-intensive procedure. So it is usually sensible to avoid Chapter 11 if either Chapter 7 or 13 will serve your needs.
But what if you’re disqualified from those other two? If you really ARE disqualified, then you may have to file under Chapter 11. But you may not be disqualified even if at first you think you are. So let’s look more closely at the qualification rules, especially as they apply to situations where at first it may look like you don’t qualify. Today we’ll give a broad overview about this as to both Chapter 7 and 13, and then in the next two blogs we’ll look more closely at each one.
Chapter 7 and the “Means Test”
The point of the quite complicated means test is to make people pay a meaningful amount of their debts if they have the “means” to do so. So those who do not pass the means test cannot file a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy,” or they can be forced out if. Instead they would usually have to proceed through Chapter 13, and be required to pay what they could afford to pay to their creditors over the following five years.
But the means test is often misunderstood. That’s not surprising given its multiple steps and odd combination of rigid formulas and discretionary enforcement. The following may help you understand it and potentially get around it:
- The means test may not even apply to you. It only applies to individuals with “primarily consumer debts,” meaning that you skip the means test altogether if half or more of your debts were incurred for business purposes instead of “primarily for a personal, family, or household purpose.”
- There’s a fixation on the first step of the means test—whether your income is above or below the “median family income” amount for your state and household size. Indeed a large majority of people who file Chapter 7 DO have lower income than the applicable median income. So they can skip the rest of the means test.
- The means test uses an odd and very specific definition of your income, one which focuses on the six-full-calendar-month prior to whatever date your Chapter 7 case is filed. This means that for many people their “income” shifts with each passing month, depending on the changes to their income of the past 6 or so months. So some careful tactical planning may enable you to fit under the median income amount by filing at the right time.
- Even if your income, as appropriately defined, is in fact over the applicable median income, that’s just the beginning of the analysis. There are a number of other steps to the means test, each with potential ways to pass the means test and qualify for Chapter 7. We’ll go through these additional steps in the next blog.
The Chapter 13 Debt Limits
At the time of filing a Chapter 13 case, your total unsecured debts must be less than $383,175, and your total secured debts must be less than $1,149,525.
As you can probably guess, there’s more to this than immediately meets the eye. For a start, the terms actually used by the statute for these limits are “noncontingent, liquidated secured debts” and “noncontingent, liquidated unsecured debts.”
Debtors with relatively high debt are often present or former business owners who signed personal guarantees for corporate debt. When are those guaranteed debts considered contingent and therefore would not count towards the debt limits, and when are they noncontingent so that they would count? And when is an unresolved claim against the debtor considered unliquidated so that they would not count towards the debt limits, and when are they liquidated so that they would count?
What these Chapter 13 debt limits really mean will be the topic two blogs from now.
Posted by Kevin on October 1, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
“Straight” Chapter 7 bankruptcy can give some relief for dealing with your back and current taxes, but Chapter 13 can help so much more.
The last blog showed how Chapter 7 can help you with your income tax debt, mostly indirectly, by writing off your other debts so you can financially concentrate on getting the IRS happy. It may also help by discharging (writing off forever) some tax debts, but only if at least three years have passed since that tax’s returns were due, AND you meet some other conditions. But if you owe a lot, and especially if you owe a number of years of taxes, Chapter 7 will often not be enough. So what more is it that Chapter 13 can do?
Chapter 13 and Income Taxes
There are many situations in which you ought to look closely at the Chapter 13 option. Focusing on income taxes, the rule of thumb about when to do so is pretty simple:
File a Chapter 13 case if Chapter 7 does not gain you enough cash flow to allow you to get caught up on your back and current taxes through manageable monthly payments, made over a reasonable period of time. In other words, file a Chapter 13 if you need the extra protection provided by Chapter 13.
What extra protection? In a Chapter 7 case you are NOT protected from the IRS beginning about three months after that case is filed-when the discharge is entered and the “automatic stay” terminates. So that means you’re arranging and then making the catch-up tax payments without any protection from the IRS’ collection procedures. That’s generally not a problem if 1) you deal with the situation very proactively, 2) the payment amount that you can comfortably handle is acceptable to the IRS, 3) it’s an amount you can pay it consistently, and 4) you do pay it perfectly until you pay it off.
In contrast, under Chapter 13 your protection from the IRS’ collection efforts continues throughout the whole 3-to-5-year length of the case. That’s protection you’ll need if you can only afford payment smaller than what the IRS wants, and/or you need more flexibly than the IRS would allow.
Under Chapter 13 you are generally allowed to pay other even more important creditors ahead of the IRS—such as mortgage arrearage, vehicle payments, and back child support. Plus you will generally not pay additional penalties and interest on the taxes, and may not have to pay all or most of the previous penalties. If the IRS has recorded a tax lien, you will have the opportunity to pay off that lien without the IRS being able to enforce that lien, resulting in the lien being released at the completion of your case.
Chapter 13 often allows you to adjust your monthly plan payments in advance based on anticipated seasonal adjustments in your income and expenses, and change those payments mid-stream as your circumstances change. You do need to deal responsibly throughout the process, or else you will lose your protection from the IRS and from your other creditors. And if you are not in fact able to do what your plan states and what the Chapter 13 rules require, so that you don’t finish your Chapter 13 case successfully, you will not get a discharge of ANY of your debts. But if your plan was put together sensibly and you follow it carefully, you should end your Chapter 13 case being current on all your past and present taxes.
Posted by Kevin on September 22, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you need bankruptcy protection but already filed a bankruptcy case within the last few years, you may still be able to file a new one now.
There are some strict rules about when you can file a bankruptcy case after having filed a previous one. But as with so many other areas of law, there are opportunities when we look more closely.
Previous Bankruptcy Filing vs. Discharge
It’s not necessarily previously FILED bankruptcy cases that count, but only ones in which you received a DISCHARGE of your debts. All the timing rules in the Bankruptcy Code dealing with when you can file a new case refer to the length of time since “the debtor has been granted a discharge” or “has received a discharge” in the previous bankruptcy case.
In other words, if your previous case was not successfully completed—it was dismissed before you finished it—that case would not prevent you from filing a case now, no matter how long or short of a time since that previous case was filed.
So make sure—absolutely sure—that you got a discharge in your earlier bankruptcy case. If you distinctly remember that your case finished the way it was supposed to, you very likely DID get a discharge. But you definitely want to make sure. Find out from your former attorney. Or dig up the discharge order issued by the Bankruptcy Court from your old paperwork, or we can likely find out for you when you come in for your initial consultation.
The Timing Rules
If you’ve heard that you have to wait 8 years between bankruptcy filings, be aware that only applies to one of a number of possible scenarios: the length of time from the previous discharged Chapter 7 case to the filing of a new Chapter 7 case.
If your previous case was a Chapter 7 one and you now want to file a Chapter 13 case, the applicable length of time is only 4 years.
If your previous case was a Chapter 13 one and you now want to file a Chapter 7 case, the length of time is only 6 years. And in fact if that previous Chapter 13 case was one in which your unsecured creditors were paid at least 70% of their debts, then there is NO limitation on filing a Chapter 7 case afterwards.
And if your previous case was a Chapter 13 one and you now want to file a Chapter 13 case, the applicable length of time is only 2 years.
And very important: on all of these the clock starts running NOT at the time of discharge—generally at the end of a case—but rather earlier, at the date of filing at the very beginning of the prior case. So what count is the date of filing of the prior case to the date of filing the new case. For example, if your previous case was a Chapter 13 one that was filed on October 1, 2006, and it took five years to complete so that the discharge was entered on October 1, 2011, you would be able to file a Chapter 7 case starting October 1, 2012.
Why File a Bankruptcy Case If You Can’t Get a Discharge?
So if you need bankruptcy protection but not enough time has passed, you can still file the case but you just won’t receive a discharge of your debts. Why would you ever want to do that?
Probably never for a Chapter 7 case, since almost always the main benefit of a Chapter 7 case is the discharge of your debts.
But Chapter 13 provides a number of other benefits distinct from the discharge of debts. For example, it stops a foreclosure and gives you years to catch up on your mortgage arrears. It also stops extremely aggressive collection of unpaid support payments, including the suspension of professional/occupational/driver’s licenses, again giving you years to bring it current. It may be able to significantly reduce what you pay for your vehicle through a “cram down.” For these and other reasons it can make a lot of sense to file a Chapter 13 case while knowing that you’ll not get a discharge of any of your debts. You may not even have any debts to discharge, but just need one or more of those other powerful benefits.
In fact that’s usually the situation with the so-called “Chapter 20.” This usually involves, first, the filing of a Chapter 7 case, which results in the discharge of most of the debtor’s debts. Then, second, immediately after that’s done, a Chapter 13 is filed to use one or more of its benefits. (Chapter 7 + 13 = 20.) Since most of the debts were discharged in the prior Chapter 7, the debtor doesn’t need a discharge in the Chapter 13 case.
This blog should make it clear that a simple rule—8 years from one bankruptcy to the next one—is often woefully incomplete and misleading. In addition, there are complicated rules concerning whether the automatic stay will apply in case involving multiple filings. This is another good argument that you truly need to talk with an attorney who focuses on bankruptcy instead of making misassumptions that could cause you lots of unnecessary grief.
Posted by Kevin on September 11, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you’re behind on child or spousal support, the support enforcement agency can be extremely aggressive. Chapter 7 doesn’t help much. Chapter 13 CAN.
In most states an ex-spouse—or the state’s support enforcement agency acting on his or her behalf—has extraordinary ways to collect on current and back support obligations. These include not just ways of getting directly at your money, but also ways to hurt you with the intent of forcing you to pay.
So we’re not just talking about garnishing your wages and bank accounts, taking away income tax refunds, or putting liens on your real estate. We’re talking coercive action. Your driver’s license can be suspended. This includes your commercial driver’s license, so that you can’t work if you’re a truck driver or have any other job requiring that license. Your professional or occupational license could also be suspended, preventing you from legally working in your profession or business as a nurse, doctor, realtor, insurance agent, mortgage broker, lawyer, or even in some places athletic trainer or funeral director!
There’s more. Your hunting, fishing, boating and other recreational licenses could be revoked. You can even be denied a U.S. passport.
Chapter 7 Gives Very Limited Help
“Straight bankruptcy” under Chapter 7 unfortunately does not stop any of these collection methods. The “automatic stay” that stops just about all other collection efforts has an exception for child and spousal support. (See Section 362(b)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code.) The only way that Chapter 7 can help is that it can often legally write off (“discharge”) all or most of your other debt so that you would have the money to pay your support. But that does not help deal with your financial emergency if you’re in the support enforcement’s crosshairs.
Chapter 13 CAN Help Where it Counts the Most
The filing of a Chapter 13—the three-to-five-year “adjustment of debts” kind of bankruptcy—DOES stop all these aggressive ways of collecting on support obligations. The “automatic stay” does apply in most respects to Chapter 13, as long as it affects the collection of your assets that did not exist at the time your case is filed, such as future income. But to make this protection last more than just a few days or weeks, you must rigorously meet a number of conditions:
- Your Chapter 13 plan must show that you are going to catch up on all the back support during the life of the plan. And then you must make your monthly plan payments on time to show that your plan is feasible and that the back support will in fact be paid in full.
- Your budget must show that you will be able to start (or continue) making the regular monthly divorce court ordered support payments, AND then you must actually pay those on time. And that starts with the first one that is legally due on whichever day it’s due immediately after your Chapter 13 is filed, and then every month thereafter.
- At the end of your Chapter 13 case you must certify that you are current on your ongoing support payments, or else you cannot complete your case and get a discharge of your remaining debts.
On the positive side, Chapter 13 neutralizes most of the extremely dangerous firepower of your ex-spouse or the support enforcement agency, and gives you the opportunity to solve an otherwise very difficult problem. Chapter 13 is often a great tool for catching up on your back support, because you are allowed to favor that debt over just about every other one. You could end up paying very little if anything else to your other creditors, except those other ones that matter to you, such as your mortgage, vehicle loan, taxes and such.
But you must be financially able to meet the above conditions, and then strictly abide by them. If during the Chapter 13 case you miss one of your regular monthly support payments, or one of your plan payments, you can expect your ex-spouse or support enforcement to ask the bankruptcy judge for “relief from the automatic stay,” that is, for permission to resume or even intensify their earlier collection efforts. At that point the judges will tend not to be very sympathetic to you, since you are not complying with the conditions that you had agreed to at the beginning of your case.
Posted by Kevin on August 28, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Straight Chapter 7 bankruptcy gives very limited help if you’re behind on your vehicle and need to keep it. And Chapter 13? Provides much more help.
The last blog was about what happens after preventing your vehicle from getting repossessed by filing a Chapter 7 case. Today’s blog is about what happens if instead you file a Chapter 13 case, the payment plan type of bankruptcy.
Back Payments
If you are worried about a vehicle repossession, you are likely a month or two behind on your loan payments. Assuming you need to keep the vehicle, if you were to file a straight Chapter 7 case you would very likely be required to catch up on your back payments within a month or two after filing the bankruptcy case. Since you also need to resume making the regular monthly payments and keep current on them, catching up on the back payments at the same time and this quickly is impossible for many people.
With Chapter 13, in contrast, you either don’t have to catch up on the back payments at all or at least would likely have many months to do so.
“Cramdown”
If your loan is more than two and a half years old, and you owe more on the loan than the value of your vehicle, you can do a “cram down”—re-write the loan to reduce the portion of the loan that must be paid in full down to the value of the vehicle. The remaining amount of the loan—the unsecured portion above the value of your vehicle—is then paid the same as the rest of your unsecured creditors, often at a steep discount in your favor. In some jurisdictions, you may pay little or nothing on this unsecured portion.
As part of the re-writing of the loan in a “cram down,” you can often also lower the interest rate and/or stretch out the payments for a longer term, all of this usually resulting in a significantly reduced monthly payment.
Option to Surrender, Now or Later
Under Chapter 7, you must pretty much know at the time your case is filed whether you want to keep or surrender the vehicle. You sign a document called “statement of intent” which is filed at court usually at the start of your case. And then very quickly after that you need to put that intention into action. If you are surrendering the vehicle, you would need to do so within about a month after filing the case.
In Chapter 13 as well, your court-filed documents indicate your intentions, most directly in your formal plan. The plan states how much you intend to pay, and which creditors are to receive how much, including the vehicle loan creditor(s). It is prepared by your attorney, approved and signed by you, and presented to the court for the judge’s “confirmation.”
If you decide through the advice of your attorney that it’s in your best interest to surrender the vehicle, then your Chapter 13 plan will not propose to pay anything to the secured portion of the debt. Instead after you surrender the vehicle, the creditor will sell it, credit the sale proceeds to the balance, and report to the bankruptcy court how much it is still owed. Just as stated above, that unsecured amount will be added to the rest of your unsecured debt, and paid whatever percentage the rest are being paid. But in most cases the dollar amount being paid by the debtor towards the pool of unsecured debt does not increase. Instead that amount is just divided differently among all the unsecured creditors. For example, if your monthly payment to the trustee is $110 and you have 9 unsecured creditors with $10 going to the trustee, then each unsecured creditor would get a little over $11 per month. If you add a creditor, the payment is still $100. So, after trustee fee, each unsecured creditor now gets $10 per month.
Unlike Chapter 7, Chapter 13 gives you some flexibility if you decide later that you can’t or chose not to maintain the payments on the vehicle. You can change your mind a year or two into the Chapter 13 case, deciding to surrender your vehicle after all.
Posted by Kevin on July 22, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Filing bankruptcy can buy you a little time or a lot of time, enough time either to transition to a new home or else to save your present home.
The same bankruptcy power that stops a lawsuit or garnishment of your wages or bank account, also stops a home foreclosure. The practical question is: what happens to your home after the foreclosure is stopped?
Chapter 7: the Option that Buys You a Little Time
A Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy,” is by far the most common type. It gives you protection against foreclosure for three months or so, or potentially for even less time if the mortgage lender is aggressive.
With such a short period of protection, a Chapter 7 would help you in two quite different situations:
1. if you have decided to surrender your home but need just a few weeks to move; or
2. if you want to keep the home, and can afford to catch up on the late payments within about a year of extra payments.
Filing a Chapter 7 is like hitting a pause button. If you’re letting your house go, it lets you catch your breath before you have to leave. If you’re hanging on to the house, a Chapter 7 gives us time to do a deal with the mortgage lender.
Chapter 13: the Option that Can Buy You Years of Time
Filing under Chapter 13 can potentially give you five years to pay off your back payments, and does so in a more flexible and powerful package.
Instead of negotiating with the mortgage lender and hoping that it will give you terms that you can live with, Chapter 13 generally gives you a set of rules to follow for catching up with that lender. It also gives you time to catch up on any back property taxes, can often get rid of a second mortgage or a judgment lien, and usually provides a practical way of dealing with other liens on your home, such as an income tax or child support lien.
A Chapter 13 case is flexible, so that if you have changes in your circumstances during your case your plan can be adjusted to account for the changes. That makes holding on to your real estate more feasible. It also means you can change your mind and decide to surrender it, months or even years after your case was filed.
The mortgage lender can always ask the bankruptcy court for permission to begin or restart a foreclosure. These kinds of creditors tend to do so either at the beginning of your case if they don’t like the Chapter 13 payment plan that you and your attorney are proposing, or later in the case if you’ve not made the payments that you said in your plan that you would make. The court balances your rights against those of the lender in deciding whether to give you the extra time you need.
Posted by Kevin on May 29, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If Chapter 7 strengthens your hand against your secured creditors, Chapter 13 turns you into Superman. It starts with a much more robust “automatic stay.”
The last blog explained how filing a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy” gives you certain leverage over secured creditors. In each of these areas, the Chapter 13 “payment plan” gives you many more powers to achieve your goals. Because there are so many Chapter 13 powers, these three areas will be covered in the next few blogs.
Stopping Creditors from Taking the Collateral
The “automatic stay,” which immediately stops your secured creditors from taking any action against the collateral under Chapter 7, gives you that same benefit under Chapter 13. But the “automatic stay” can be tremendously stronger in Chapter 13 for three reasons:
1. Lasts So Much Longer: Chapter 7’s “automatic stay” generally lasts only about 3 months, and sometimes not even that long if a creditor asks the court for “relief from stay” to get permission to go after the collateral. At best, Chapter 7 only pauses the action against you and the collateral. In contrast, a Chapter 13 case itself lasts usually 3 to 5 years, and the protection of the “automatic stay” is in effect that entire time, again unless a creditor is successful in getting “relief from stay.” (usually because the debtor fails to make make multiple payments to that creditor).
2. The “Co-Debtor Stay”: A Chapter 7 case does not stop a creditor from pursuing any co-signer you may have or that co-signer’s collateral. Chapter 13 does. There are limitations to this special kind of “stay,” so how much practical help it provides to you depends on the facts of each case. But at the very least the co-debtor stay immediately protects the co-signer, giving you a chance to get your Chapter 13 plan started and to see whether and/or how the creditor reacts.
As with the usual “automatic stay,” an affected creditor can ask for “relief from the co-debtor stay” to get permission to go after the co-signer or its collateral. Unless and until this motion is filed and the bankruptcy court decides to give this permission, your co-signer is protected.
3. Enables the Other Chapter 13 Powers to Work: Chapter 13 gives you many strong powers for dealing with secured creditors, many of which only work because of the long and continuous protection provided by the “automatic stay.” For example, unlike Chapter 7 which provides no mechanism for catching up on unpaid mortgage payments (other than whatever payment schedule the creditor voluntarily agrees to), Chapter 13 effectively gives you the entire length of the 3-to-5-year case to catch up. But this only works because throughout this time the mortgage holder is stopped from foreclosing by the ongoing “automatic stay.”
Another example illustrates well the crucial role of the “automatic stay” in Chapter 13. Most mortgage documents require the homeowner to pay the home’s property taxes either directly to the taxing authority or more often through an escrow account set up for that purpose. If the taxes are not paid by the homeowner, that is a separate violation of the mortgage agreement and separate grounds for the creditor to start a foreclosure against the homeowner. When the homeowner files a Chapter 13 case, this stops BOTH the mortgage creditor’s foreclosure AND any present or upcoming tax foreclosure by the county (or applicable taxing authority). The homeowner’s Chapter 13 plan shows how the back payments to both the creditor and the taxing authority will be paid. As long as you abide by the Plan, the automatic stays continues in effect, and the taxing authority cannot foreclose.
Posted by Kevin on May 21, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 13 protects you while you catch up on your vehicle loan, or you may not need to catch up on that loan at all.
_________________________
Chapter 7 sometimes gives you just enough of a break and enough time to catch up on your vehicle loan if you’re behind. But usually it only buys you a couple months. Chapter 13 gives you many months, or even a couple years, to catch up. And if you got your loan more than two years and a half years ago, and you owe on it more than the vehicle is worth, you probably won’t even have to catch up on any missed payments. And you will likely pay less per month, and pay less on the loan overall until you own it free and clear.
The Law of Vehicle Loans Arrears
A vehicle loan is in effect made up of two commitments you’ve made to your lender:
- a promise to pay a certain amount each month, plus interest, until the debt is paid off; and
- a lien on the vehicle, giving the lender a right to repossess your vehicle if you fail to keep your promise to pay.
If right before filing bankruptcy you were behind on your vehicle payments, your lender would have the right to repossess your vehicle. But once you file a bankruptcy case, the “automatic stay” stops any repossession. This protection lasts as long as the bankruptcy case is open, unless the lender files a motion to get “relief from the automatic stay” and gets earlier permission to repossess.
Vehicle Loans in Arrears in Chapter 7
If you are not current on a vehicle loan and want to keep that vehicle, a Chapter 7 would be a sensible option if you know you will be able to bring that loan current within about two months of your bankruptcy filing. Certain vehicle lenders might be more flexible and give you more time, but that’s not common. Ask your attorney about the likely practices of you lender when you discuss your vehicle loan options.
Vehicle Loans in Arrears in Chapter 13
If you need more time than two months or so to catch up on your vehicle loan, then Chapter 13 may be the right option for you. In most situations you would be allowed to catch up over a period of many months, potentially even a few years.
In some situations you may not even need to catch up at all. This happens if, and only if, 1) you took out the loan more than 910 days (about 2 and a half years) before you file your Chapter 13 case, and 2) your vehicle is worth less than your debt against it. If so, you will not only NOT need to catch up on the loan, you will usually be able to pay a lower monthly payment, often a lower interest rate, and less on the loan overall, and then you will own the vehicle free and clear at the end of the case.
This is informally called a vehicle loan “cramdown,” and can ONLY be done under Chapter 13, not under Chapter 7.
Even if you are current on your vehicle loan, or could catch up within two months or so, and therefore would likely be able to keep your vehicle under Chapter 7, IF your vehicle is worth significantly less than what you owe on it you should talk with your attorney about how much money a Chapter 13 could save you through a “cramdown.” This might especially make sense if Chapter 13 also helps you in other ways.
Posted by Kevin on May 5, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If your financial life is legally simple, your bankruptcy will likely be simple. What is it about your financial life that makes for a not so simple bankruptcy case?
Bankruptcy can be very flexible. If your finances are complicated, bankruptcy likely has a decent way to deal with all the messes. As in life, sometimes there are trade-offs and important choices to be made. But usually, whether your life is straightforward or complex, bankruptcy can adjust.
To demonstrate this in a practical way, here are some differences between a simple and not so simple bankruptcy case.
1. No non-exempt assets vs. owning non-exempt assets: In the vast majority of Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases, you get to keep everything that you own. But even if you do own assets that are not protected (“non-exempt”), there are usually decent ways of holding on to them even within Chapter 7, and if necessary by filing a Chapter 13 to do so.
2. Under median income vs. over median income: If your income is below a certain amount for your state and family size, you have the freedom to file either Chapter 7 or 13. But even if you are above that amount, you still may be able to file under either Chapter, depending on a series of other calculations. Again, Chapter 13 is there if necessary, and sometimes that may be the better choice anyway.
3. Not behind on real estate mortgage vs. you are behind: If you don’t have a home mortgage or are current on it, that makes for a simpler case. But bankruptcy has many ways to help you save your house. Sometimes that can be done through Chapter 7, although Chapter 13 has a whole chest full of good tools if Chapter 7 doesn’t help you enough.
4. No debts with collateral vs. have such debts: The utterly simplest cases have no secured debts, that is, those with collateral that the creditor has rights to. But most people have some secured debt. Both Chapter 7 and 13 have various ways to help you with these debts, whether you want to surrender the collateral or instead need to keep it.
5. No income tax debt/student loans/child or spousal support arrearage vs. have these debts: Bankruptcy treats certain special kinds of debts in ways that are more favorable for those creditors, so life is easier in bankruptcy if you don’t have any of them. But if you do, you might be surprised how sometimes you have more power over these otherwise favored creditors than you think. You can write off or at least reduce some taxes in either Chapter 7 or 13, stop collections for back support through Chapter 13, and in certain circumstances gain some temporary or permanent advantages over student loans.
6. No challenge expected by a creditor to the discharge of its debt vs. expecting a challenge: In most cases, no creditors raise challenges to your ability to write off their debts. Even when they threaten to do so, they often don’t within the short timeframe they must do so. But if a creditor does raise a challenge, bankruptcy procedures can resolve these kinds of disputes relatively efficiently.
7. Never filed bankruptcy vs. filed prior bankruptcy: Actually, if you filed a prior bankruptcy, or even more than one, it may well make no difference whatsoever. But depending on the exact timing, a prior bankruptcy filing can not only limit which Chapter you can file under, it can even sometimes affect how much protection you get from your creditors under your new case.
We’ll dig into some of these differences in upcoming blogs. In the meantime remember that even though your financial life may seem messy in a bunch of ways, there’s a good chance that bankruptcy can clean it up and tie up those loose ends. It’s called a fresh start.
Posted by Kevin on April 22, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Most creditors don’t challenge your write-off of their debts in bankruptcy. But if one does, the system is poised to resolve that challenge relatively quickly.
The last blog, and this one, are about what happens when a creditor raises one of the few available arguments to try to prevent its debt from being legally discharged. As emphasized last time:
- Most potentially dischargeable debts DO in fact get discharged. To avoid any particular debt from being discharged, the creditor has the burden of establishing that the debt arose out of a very specific sort of bad behavior by you, one that is on a list that is in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code.
- Your creditors have a very firm deadline to raise such a challenge, or else lose the ability ever to do so.
- The challenge is raised by filing a complaint . This starts an “adversary proceeding,” a lawsuit focused only on this question.
Avoid Losing by Default
After a creditor files a complaint, the most important thing to realize is that the creditor will automatically win if you and your attorney do not file a formal answer at the court within the stated deadline. So contact your attorney immediately if you receive a complaint.
Most Discharge Challenges Don’t Go to Trial
The adversary proceeding can go through all the steps of a regular lawsuit. After filing the answer, there can be “discovery”—the process of requesting and exchanging any pertinent information and documents, and holding depositions (questioning witnesses under oath). And there could be various kinds of motions, pre-trial hearings, and a full trial. But these kinds of adversary proceedings rarely go through all these step and get to trial, because the amount of money at issue usually does not justify the cost involved for either side to pursue it that far. So after both sides get a clear picture of the facts, there is usually a settlement. Or the debtor does some quick math, and decides that it would be cheaper to buy off a creditor than to spend the money on additional legal fees with the possibility that you could lose at trial and be forced to pay the creditor the full amount due (note that representation in an adversary proceeding is never included in the base fee).
But if there is enough at stake, or else if one or both sides are unreasonable and insist on getting a decision from the judge, the dispute does go to trial. These trials usually last a half-day, or a day, very seldom longer. At the end of trial the bankruptcy judge decides whether the debt is discharged or not. Extremely rarely, this decision can be appealed, in fact theoretically all the way up to the United States Supreme Court!
What’s So Quick and Efficient about All This?
Any litigation is very expensive, so you hope to avoid any discharge challenges. But bankruptcy court is a relatively fast and efficient forum for a number of reasons:
1) Because creditors have the opportunity to review your finances beforehand, much of the time they will not bother to raise challenges at all.
2) If a creditor does raise a challenge, the issues are narrow and so the fight is usually focused on just a few critical facts.
3) Adversary proceedings move along fairly quickly. Compared to most state court and regular federal court litigation which often takes a couple of years, these kinds of adversary proceedings tend to be resolved in a matter of few months.
4) Because bankruptcy judges deal with these kinds of challenges all the time, they are extremely familiar with these legal issues. So they move these cases fast.
Having a creditor object to the discharge of a debt can significantly complicate a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. But these disputes are usually settled relatively quickly. Help this happen by informing your attorney about any threats made by creditors before your bankruptcy is filed, and then working closely with your attorney if a creditor follows through on its threat by filing a complaint.
