You Are Here: home > Blog > Bankruptcy Blog > Setting the Record Straight About Whether You Can File a Chapter 7 “Straight Bankruptcy” Case

Setting the Record Straight About Whether You Can File a Chapter 7 “Straight Bankruptcy” Case

Posted by on May 28, 2016 under Bankruptcy Blog | Be the First to Comment

From the mid-1990’s to 2005, the creditor lobby worked hard to change the Bankruptcy Code.  In their eyes, too many people, who could afford to pay part of their debts, were filing under Chapter 7 and walking away scot free.  They wanted people to be forced into Chapter 13, where you have to make monthly payments to a Trustee for 36-60 months if the prospective debtor had the means to pay.  Finally, in 2005, Congress changed the law which is called “Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection ” Act (BAPCPA).  11 years later, there is still confusion among the public about whether you can still file for Chapter 7, or you must file under Chapter 13.   To qualify for Chapter 7, you have to pass the Means Test, the bankruptcy court version of what the IRS uses to determine what you can pay on back taxes.  The Means Test is not straightforward, and some issues concerning its application are not clear even after a decade of BAPCPA.  However, the bottom line is that you can still file under Chapter  7.

1. Bad Publicity

The creditor lobby, the media and sometimes even the bankruptcy system have all had a hand in making many people think that qualifying for “straight bankruptcy” is hard.  While it is true that for the first couple of years, Chapter 13 filings were up, after debtor attorneys started to understand the new system,  the vast majority of filings  in New Jersey are still under Chapter 7.

2.  A Confusing Statute

Upfront, BAPCPA is loaded with abuse prevention but I don’t see much consumer protection.  The law is poorly written, confusing and sometimes one section contradicts another section.   Moreover, because of these statutory contradictions and ambiguities, Courts, all the way up to the Supreme Court, have been scratching their heads trying to make sense of it.  If the judges are having trouble with the complexities of the new law, then it is no surprise that ordinary people are confused.

3. Most Can “Skip” the “Means Test”

Parts of the “means test”–the major mechanism now for qualifying under Chapter 7—are mind-numbingly confusing, but many people can avoid all that simply by virtue of their income. Without getting into the calculations here, basically if your “income” (as specially defined for this purpose) before filing was no more than the published median income amount for your state and size of family, then you qualify for Chapter 7 without needing to go through any more of the  “means test.”

Also, certain kinds of folks can skip the “means test” no matter the amount of their income, specifically present or recent business owners who have more business debt than consumer debt.

4.  Passing the Means Test turned out to be easier than we thought

Even if you are a consumer debtor whose “income” IS higher than the applicable median income amount, through some good lawyering, which is creative but perfectly legitimate,  you may well be able to lower your “income” or increase the reporting of your expenses to bring your overall under the applicable median amount.  If so, you qualify for Chapter 7.

5. Chapter 13 is Sometimes the Better Option

The purpose of the “means test” is to make people who have the “means” pay back some of their debts through a Chapter 13 case. In the relatively few times that a person does not qualify under Chapter 7 and so has to do a Chapter 13 case, in almost all cases,  the amount that must be paid in the Chapter 13 case to the creditors is much less than the total debt, making it not such a bad deal. Also, often a person who “just wants to file Chapter 7 and get it over with” learns that Chapter 13 comes with surprising advantages, which are more helpful to the debtor in the long run.

Add A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.