Posted by Kevin on September 22, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog | 
Filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy while letting go of your home can be a smart combination.
_____________________
Chapter 13—the three to five year partial payment plan—consists of an entire toolbox full of different tools to help people hang onto their homes. But that may not be what you need. After getting informed about how those tools would work (or not work) in your situation, you may decide that it’s best for you to walk away from your home. If so, here are some advantages of doing that in conjunction with filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy:
- Have more control over when you leave:
If you have a foreclosure sale date scheduled, or a foreclosure lawsuit pending, usually you would have no say about when you have to leave. You could even be forcibly evicted by county sheriff deputies. However, if you file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, that will delay the foreclosure sale or lawsuit, at least for a few weeks, and possibly for a matter of months. That alone could save you a couple thousand dollars in rent. Also, after a bankruptcy filing, your mortgage lender may well be willing to negotiate a departure date convenient to you, in return for avoiding their need to rack up a lot of attorney fees. As part of the deal you may be willing to sign over your title through a “deed in lieu of foreclosure,” with no risk of further liability since your bankruptcy case is discharging any remaining debt.
- Avoid house-related debt following you:
Depending on your situation, and on your local state laws, after surrendering a house without bankruptcy you risk being saddled with debts coming at you from various directions. Sometimes you could be liable for any deficiency on the first mortgage. Surrendering your house to a first mortgagee does not take you off the hook on a second mortgage. You could also be liable on other debts related to the home—such as unpaid utilities, contractor liens, property tax liens, or homeowner association dues. Many of these debts would be discharged if you filed a bankruptcy.
- Have an attorney in your corner:
Fair or unfair, your mortgage lender will likely treat you better when it knows you are being advised and represented by an attorney (assuming that you would be filing your Chapter 7 case through an attorney). You will have the peace of mind that comes from knowing your rights, understanding what will happen when, and having an advocate available to get directly involved as needed.
- Get a fresh financial start instead of a continuation of a vicious cycle:
If you are surrendering your house and reducing your monthly cost of keeping a roof over your head, you may be tempted to think you don’t need a bankruptcy. Perhaps you don’t. But if you have fallen so far behind on you mortgage that it’s gotten to the point of foreclosure, the odds are that you need more help than giving up your house alone will achieve. You at least owe it to yourself to get legal advice about your financial situation and your realistic options. You can then be pro-active to turn your situation around rather than waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Think about it
Posted by Kevin on July 5, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 7 bankruptcy can often also wipe judgment liens off the title to your home.
_________________________
Liens against your property—such as the lienholder’s lien on your car or truck title, or your home lender’s trust deed on your home’s title—generally are not wiped out with a bankruptcy filing. The bankruptcy discharge (write-off) of debts ends your personal liability on that debt but does not end a creditor’s rights in any collateral. Accordingly, a judgment lien—the lien that attaches to your home if a creditor gets a judgment against you—gives the judgment creditor certain rights to your home, including often the right to foreclose on it. But under some circumstances judgment liens CAN be wiped away, or voided, during bankruptcy, so that the creditor would have no such further rights against your home.
_________________________
If you still want to make good on your promise to take charge of your financial life, this and the next few blogs may help. They are about less familiar benefits of filing bankruptcy, starting with some less familiar benefits of Chapter 7.
The Chapter 7 version of bankruptcy usually achieves two main goals—it stops all or most of your creditors from collecting against you and your assets, and it “discharges,” meaning it legally forever wipes out, all or most of your debts. In most cases, that’s pretty much what it does for you, and that’s often just what you need. In contrast, Chapter 13—the “adjustment of debts” payment plan—is the creative, lots-of-tools-in-the-toolbox version of bankruptcy, often significantly better for dealing with complicated situations. But Chapter 13 takes at least 3 years compared to as short as 3 months for Chapter 7, it costs at least 3 or 4 times more, and is less likely to be completed successfully.
So here’s a tool which is available under Chapter 7—getting rid of certain judgment liens on your home. Here are the conditions for this to happen:
- You must qualify for and claim a homestead exemption on the real estate upon which you have the judgment lien.
- That lien must be a “judicial lien,” which usually means one gotten through a court judgment, but is specifically defined in the Bankruptcy Code as “a lien obtained by judgment, levy, sequestration, or other legal or equitable process or proceeding.”
- The debt underlying this judgment lien cannot be for child or spousal support, or for a mortgage foreclosure.
- The judgment lien at issue must “impair” the homestead exemption, which the law defines to mean:
- the value of all the liens on the house, including the judgment lien
- PLUS
- the amount of homestead exemption that you could claim if there were no liens on the house
- MUST BE MORE THAN
- the value of the house (assuming you are its sole owner).
So for example, if:
- the judgment lien is $20,000 and your mortgage is $150,000
- PLUS
- your available homestead exemption is $30,000
- that $20,000 judgment lien would be impairing the homestead exemption and could be voided in bankruptcy
- as long as your house was worth less than $200,000.
Lastly, please understand that merely filing the Chapter 7 bankruptcy will discharge the underlying debt that caused the judgment and its lien. But voiding the judgment lien itself takes an extra step. In NJ that means filing a motion and obtaining an order or else the judgment lien will continue to exist against your home. Also, that motion to void the judgment lien needs to be filed while your Chapter 7 case is still open and active, which usually means within about 90 days after your case is filed. Finally, lawyers usually charge a bit more than the ordinary flat fee for providing this service since it entails additional work.
So, if you own a home, find out if you have a judgment lien against the title. If you do, talk to a bankruptcy attorney about whether that lien could be voided in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case. If so, gaining this very important extra protection for your home could make filing bankruptcy that much more beneficial for you.
Posted by Kevin on April 16, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
An income tax debt that you owe for the 2013 tax year presents both some challenges and opportunities if you file bankruptcy in early 2013. The challenges are practical ones. You have a debt that you wish you didn’t have, it can’t be written off (discharged) in bankruptcy, and you may well not know how much it is because you haven’t prepared the tax return yet. So it can be a frustrating and scary uncertainty.
The interplay between taxes and bankruptcy can be complicated, however, under the right circumstances your 2013 income tax debt can be—believe it or not–paid in full essentially without costing you anything. That’s because under bankruptcy law in many circumstances recent tax debts are paid in place of your other creditors, leaving less or nothing for those other creditors. This can happen in both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13, much more likely under that latter. This blog shows how your taxes can be paid in an “asset” Chapter 7 case, and the next blog shows the more common Chapter 13 situation.
_________________________
Payment of 2013 Income Taxes in an “Asset” Chapter 7 Case
Most Chapter 7 cases are “no asset” ones. This means that the bankruptcy trustee takes nothing from you because everything you have is exempt or else not worth the trustee’s effort to collect. So none of your creditors—including the IRS—are paid anything through your Chapter 7 case itself. In that situation, you would have to make arrangements to pay any 2013 income tax with the IRS (and/or any state tax agency, if applicable).
On the other hand, an “asset” Chapter 7 case is one in which you own something that is NOT exempt and IS worth for the trustee to collect, sell, and distribute its proceeds to the creditors.
The Example
Consider this. You own a boat that has become more expensive and more work to own than you’d expected. In a Chapter 7 case, if you do not claim an exemption on the boat and your bankruptcy trustee believes the boat is worth collecting from you and selling, then the 2013 taxes are among the first debts that the trustee will pay out of the proceeds. Why? Because the taxes are what is called “priority debts”. Although most of your creditors are paid pro rata—equally, based solely on the relative amount of their debts— “priority debts” are paid ahead of your other creditors. So, assuming you do not have any debts that are even higher on the priority list (see Section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code), your 2013 IRS/state income tax will be paid in full before the trustee pays anything to any of your other creditors. As a result you would no longer have this tax to pay after your Chapter 7 case is completed.
Caution
For this to work as described takes just the right conditions, with more twists and turns than can be fully explained here. So definitely discuss all this thoroughly with your bankruptcy attorney.
Posted by Kevin on April 11, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 7 sometimes doesn’t help you enough with certain debts. Included are some income taxes, child and spouse support you’re behind on, home mortgage arrearage, and vehicle loans, among others.
There are times when filing a straight Chapter 7 case will help you enough by writing off your other debts so that you have the practical means to take care of the remaining special debt(s). It frees up money. But other times you need the extra protection that a Chapter 13 payment plan gives you.
_________________________
Here are the ways Chapter 7 could help with the first three of the special kinds of debts mentioned above, and ways that Chapter 13 can help more if necessary. The fourth kind—vehicle loans—are in some respects more complicated, so they’ll be addressed separately in an upcoming blog.
Income Taxes
Some income taxes can be discharged (written off) in bankruptcy, including under Chapter 7, but some can’t, generally more recent ones. If you have a tax debt that will not be discharged, but is the only debt that will not be and is small enough, you can file a Chapter 7 case and make payment arrangements directly with the IRS (or applicable state tax agency). If the monthly payment amount is manageable, this could well be the sensible way to go.
But if the tax amount is too large for what you can afford to pay, or you have a number of debts that would not be discharged under Chapter 7, then Chapter 13 would help in the following ways:
- You would likely get more time to pay off the tax.
- The IRS or state agency would be prevented from taking collection action without permission of the bankruptcy court.
- Generally you would not need to pay interest and penalties from the time your case is filed, allowing you to pay off the tax debt with less money.
Child and Spousal Support Arrearage
State laws allow ex-spouses and support enforcement agencies to be extremely aggressive in their collection methods. Sometimes you can work out a deal with these enforcement agencies, sometimes not. If you can make a deal, then Chapter 7 may make sense for you.
But otherwise you need the extraordinary power of Chapter 13. It gives you three to five years to pay the support current, as long as you rigorously keep up with your ongoing monthly payments in the meantime. And throughout this time all of the very tough collection tools usually available to your ex-spouse or support agency are put on hold for your benefit.
Home Mortgage Arrearage
If you are behind on your home mortgage but want to keep the home, and you file a Chapter 7 case, you are at the mercy of your mortgage company about how much time you will have to catch up on the mortgage.
In contrast, similarly to what is stated above, Chapter 13 will give you three to five years to cure that arrearage. So, if you are too far behind to be able to catch up within the time you would be given under Chapter 7, then you need to file under Chapter 13.
Posted by Kevin on April 4, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
To qualify for Chapter 13, you must be an “individual with regular income, meaning that your income is sufficiently stable and regular to enable you to make payments under a Chapter 13 plan. That requirement of a “stable and regular” income means not only at the time of filing, but for the entire duration of the plan (36 to 60 months). In a way, every Chapter 13 is a leap in faith that the debtor’s financial situation will be stable (or better) through the duration of the plan. Of course, life throws you curve balls. You lose a job, or your hours are cut. You or a member of your family gets sick and insurance does not cover the whole bill. The car breaks down-more than once. Your wife has to quit her job to take care of her sick mother. Whatever. The Code takes this into account. How? One way is by allowing you to convert your Chapter 13 to a Chapter 7.
Here’s an example to illustrate this. You own a home and have two mortgages. You are $5,000 behind in payments on your first mortgage (balance $250,000) and cannot remember when you last paid the second (balance of $75,000). You owe $25,000 in credit card bills, and another $10,000 in medical expenses that the insurance did not cover. The home is worth a less than the first mortgage. You had been laid off, but got a new job, and are starting to get significant overtime. But now, almost miraculously the debt collectors are calling again. You are making enough to take care of that first mortgage, your current expenses, and if everyone tightens belts, a little more, say $250 per month.
Chapter 13 may be the answer. How, you say. Even if everything goes right, what am I going to do about that second mortgage? Chapter 13 gives you the power to “strip” the second mortgage; that is, convert the second mortgage secured debt into unsecured debt. Then, the second mortgage gets paid pro rata with the credit cards and medical bills. How much? What ever is left over after paying your current monthly bills, your first mortgage arrearages, and the fee to your lawyer and the trustee. Could be very little. Plus the “second mortgage strip” also lowers the debt against the home by the amount of that second mortgage, bringing the debt down closer to the home’s market value. Seems to satisfy both your short term and long term goals. Chapter 13 looks good, so you file under that chapter. You know it is going to be a bit of a stretch, but if the stars line up right, you get to keep your home and discharge your debts.
15 months into the plan, your boss cuts back on most of your overtime. You can’t even pay the first mortgage much less the trustee. If the case is dismissed, there is no more automatic stay so your creditors will come after you because you now have wages that can be garnished. What to do?
The Bankruptcy Code explicitly states in that a Chapter 13 debtor may convert a case under this chapter to a case under chapter 7 at any time. Any waiver of the right to convert under this subsection is unenforceable.
Not a perfect solution, by any means. However, better than being thrown to the wolves. Let’s look at the scenario under the converted Chapter 7. First, you do not have to make any more payments to the trustee. That comes out to $3000 per year. Second, your Chapter 7 case is over in about 3 months and you most probably get a discharge. That means that you have knocked out all your debts (mortgage, credit card and medical).
BUT, the Code differentiates between the debt and the security for the debt. The debt is discharged but the security (mortgage) remains on the property. Unless you can make a deal with the mortgagees, you will probably lose your home. But you will not owe any deficiency on the first mortgage or anything on the second. Moreover, you will knock out the credit card and medical debt.
Now, if you work with experienced bankruptcy counsel, he or she will lay out this scenario in a way that you know or should know that you are taking a “shot” to save your home. If it works, God bless. If not, you switch into a 7, get your discharge and move on with your life.
So conversion to Chapter 7 can be a decent result when the goals of Chapter 13 cannot be met, either because of unexpected circumstances or because the debtors took some calculated risks which did not go their way.
Posted by Kevin on February 20, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
You have some wiggle room if you either want to get out of your bankruptcy case or change to the other Chapter.
_________________________
After starting your bankruptcy case, your circumstances could suddenly change or for some other reason you may no longer want to be in the bankruptcy case that you’re in. Getting out of the bankruptcy court altogether—dismissing your case—is not very easy in a Chapter 7 case, easier in a Chapter 13 one. Changing from one Chapter to the other—converting the case–is usually allowed. We start today with some reasons why you might want to dismiss or convert, and then in the next two blogs talk about dismissal and conversion first under Chapter 7 and then under Chapter 13.
_________________________
Why Dismiss or Convert?
To put this into context, what types of situations would lead to a person to want to get out of a bankruptcy case after presumably giving the decision a lot of thought beforehand?
Although some situations could apply to both Chapter 7 and 13, these two procedures are very different in two very practical ways so that the situations that would motivate you to get out of the case tend to be different. The two big differences are their length and likelihood of successful completion:
• most Chapter 7 cases usually lasts only about three months, compared to three to five years for a successful Chapter 13 case; and
• most Chapter 7 cases are completed successfully (at least those where the debtors are represented by an attorney), while a significant percentage of Chapter 13 cases are not.
Why Would You Want to Dismiss or Convert Under Chapter 7?
Under Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy,” there’s a lot less that can go wrong and a lot less time for your circumstances to change. The focus is on your assets and debts at a fixed moment in time, at the point your case is filed. So if a careful analysis of your financial situation at that time indicates that your case meets the requirements of Chapter 7, not much should change that.
Here are some problems that can nevertheless arise making you wish you could get out of your Chapter 7 case:
• Although assets are fixed as of the date of filing, under Section 541(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, if a relative dies within 180 days of the filing of your case leaving you as the beneficiary of an inheritance or a life insurance policy, that inheritance or insurance proceed becomes available to pay your creditors.
• If shortly after filing your case you have an accident and incur significant new medical debts because of having insufficient medical insurance, the new debt cannot be included and discharged in your case because that debt did not exist when your case was filed.
• You may be unaware at the time your case is filed that you have a legal right to a valuable asset, for example you did not know that your parents’ vacation home had been secretly deeded to you and your siblings.
Why Would You Want to Dismiss or Convert Under Chapter 13?
Under Chapter 13 “adjustment of debts bankruptcy,” there’s a lot more going on and so a lot more that can go wrong than in a Chapter 7 case. A Chapter 13 plan lays out how much and when the various creditors will be paid (if at all), and creditors can object to the plan and sometimes force it to be changed before it’s approved by the bankruptcy judge. Then you have to comply with the terms of the plan, over the course of three to five years, which give a lot of time for your circumstances to change. The focus is on your financial life not at a fixed moment in time but rather throughout the years of your case. Your Chapter 13 plan usually assumes that your income and expenses will stay the same, or else sometimes tries to predict how they will change into the future. Either way, those assumptions come with risk.
So all kinds of things can happen which could make you wish you could get out of your Chapter 13 case, but here are some representative examples:
• Your plan is designed around your desire to save your home, but a year or so later you find a job which requires you to move, taking away the primary purpose of your case.
• You filed a joint Chapter 13 case with your spouse, but two years later you go through a divorce, totally changing your financial life.
• Your income is significantly reduced permanently; so much so that even amending your Chapter 13 plan is not feasible, making you no longer eligible for Chapter 13.
• Your income is significantly increased a year into your case; so much so that you become obligated to amend your plan to pay most or all of your debt.
Again, the next two blogs will be about getting out of Chapter 7 and then Chapter 13, in situations like the examples given above.
Posted by Kevin on February 3, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Each spouse in a marriage with significant tax debts has his or her self-interest, which may need a different solution than the other spouse.
_________________________
Married couples can and often file bankruptcy together. Doing so when they both owe substantial income taxes may especially makes sense. But each spouse needs to understand his and her own rights and options before deciding whether to file bankruptcy or not, and if so whether to join in the other’s bankruptcy or file his or her own case.
_________________________
If a couple owes a lot of income taxes, often it is because of the actions of one of spouses—such as one spouse running a business into which that spouse puts his or her heart and soul but still eventually failed. The spouse who is “at fault” may well be feeling deep frustration and guilt, while the other spouse is experiencing feelings of anger, disappointment, and even betrayal. This extra source of conflict can not only make their situation more emotionally challenging but legally as well.
This blog suggests some principles to consider if you’re in a similar situation.
The Two Spouses Each Have Their Own Self Interest
To state what is probably obvious, just because two people are married does not mean that their financial situations are the same, or that their legal problems and the potential solutions are the same. While some spouses do have close to identical situations—if they are jointly liable on all the same debts and share ownership in all their assets—often that’s not the case. Each person can have his or her own separate debts and to some degree his or her own assets, making their financial situations very different. And beyond those tangible differences, each person can have different goals and different attitudes about how to deal with his or her individual problems and their ones in common.
Because income taxes are such an unusual debt, they can greatly complicate the self-interest of each spouse. Taxes are unusual in how they are incurred. For example, a tax debt can arise primarily out of the actions of one of the spouses, with the other spouse becoming completely liable by simply signing a joint tax return. That spouse might eventually be able to get out of that liability through the “innocent spouse” exception, another complication not available with any other kind of debt. Taxes are also quite unusual in how they are treated in bankruptcy. There are relatively complicated rules about what taxes will and will not be discharged, and how each portion of each tax account can be handled under Chapter 13.
Each nuance of these rules can create different self-interests for each spouse.
The Two Spouses May Each Need Their Own Bankruptcy
The two spouses’ different self-interests may well lead to different solutions. Sometimes that may mean one person filing bankruptcy and the other not, or one person filing a Chapter 7 case and the other a Chapter 13 one.
The Two Spouses Could Need Separate Attorneys
Without getting deeply into delicate attorneys’ ethical rules about conflict of interest, attorneys need to be careful about simultaneously representing any two people who have different interests. This is true regardless if these two people are married and have some common interests. In the end the two may end up filing a joint bankruptcy because it is in their individual and mutual best interest to do so. But before getting there each person must be made fully aware of his or her individual rights and legal options, whether this happens through two separate attorneys or through a single one. One or both spouses may decide to sacrifice some of their individual interests for their common good, but can only do so when their rights and options have been clearly laid out for each of them.
Posted by Kevin on January 6, 2014 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Filing bankruptcy with or without your spouse affects the discharge of debts you each receive, and also affects whether you file under Chapter 7 or 13.
_________________________
Continuing from the last blog:
- There are consequences to filing separately or together, consequences affecting:
- the discharge of your debts.
_________________________
The last blog was about what happens to a spouse who doesn’t file bankruptcy when the other spouse does, specifically as to the “automatic stay,” the immediate protection from creditor collection activity. In a nutshell, there is NO protection from joint creditors for the non-filing spouse in Chapter 7, while there IS some important but limited protection in Chapter 13 through the “co-debtor stay.”
The “automatic stay” is temporary protection that goes into effect at the beginning of and can last the length of the case. The “discharge”—the permanent legal write-off of a debt which is the topic of today’s blog—happens at the end of either a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case.
Debts Are Individual
A debt is an individual liability. Discharging a debt in bankruptcy is not so much a destruction of that debt as a legal pronouncement that an individual is no longer liable on that debt.
Each person owes a debt individually—we are not automatically liable for our spouse’s debts. So if ALL of a couple’s debts are owed by one spouse and only that spouse, then a bankruptcy by that spouse will leave the couple with no debts (assuming the debts are of the kind that can be discharged).
Chapter 7 Discharges Debts Only of the Filing Spouse(s)
Much more common is the situation in which two spouses each have some individual debts and some joint debts.
If they file a JOINT Chapter 7 straight bankruptcy, at the completion of the case their debts will be discharged (legally written off). That includes debts that each spouse owes individually, as well as those for which they are both legally liable.
If only ONE of two spouses files a Chapter 7 case, only that spouse’s debts will be discharged. That includes debts that only that spouse owes individually, as well as his or her obligation on any debts owed jointly with his or her spouse. But the non-filing spouse’s debts will not be discharged. And that includes debts that only that spouse owes individually, as well as his or her obligation on any debts owed jointly with his or her spouse.
Distinguishing Individual and Joint Debts
What this means is that one spouse should not file without the other unless they know exactly how much debt the non-filing spouse is legally liable for—both his or her separate debt and their joint debt.
This is not always obvious. A seemingly non-liable spouse can in fact be legally liable on a debt in numerous possible ways. A creditor’s monthly bill that is addressed to only one spouse does not necessarily mean that the other spouse did not sign and become obligated under the original loan agreement. Under certain states’ laws a spouse is obligated for the other spouse’s debts under certain circumstances. Also, specific creditors—such as the IRS—are favored with special laws creating liability for the other spouse. So both spouses’ debts need to be reviewed carefully to see who is liable on each contractually and as a matter of law.
There’s No “Co-Debtor Discharge” in Chapter 13
There is no discharge of a non-filing spouse’s liability analogous to the special “co-debtor stay” of Chapter 13. The filing spouse has the opportunity to protect the non-filing spouse during the course of the 3-to-5-year Chapter 13 case through the “co-debtor stay,” but if the debt is not paid in full during the case then the creditor can pursue the non-filing spouse once the case is over. That’s true even though the filing spouse’s liability for the same debt is discharged at the end of that Chapter 13 case.
Take as an example a husband and wife owing $5,000 on a credit card that they both thought only the husband was liable on because they understood it was tied to his business that failed. They’d forgotten that long ago they had both signed the credit card application. If only the husband files a Chapter 13 case, the “co-debtor stay” would immediately prevent the credit card creditor from pursuing the wife. That creditor may not bother to object to the “co-debtor stay.” Then at the end of the husband’s Chapter 13 case, any of his remaining liability on that credit card debt (beyond whatever portion was paid through his plan, if any) would be discharged, and his case completed and closed. That would terminate the “co-debtor stay,” allowing the creditor to pursue the wife for the full $5,000 debt (less any payments made in the Chapter 13 plan), plus years of interest and late charges.
The Bottom Line
Be very cautious about filing a separate bankruptcy case—Chapter 7 or 13—without your spouse. Discuss your debts thoroughly with your attorney, getting strong verification that the non-filing spouse is liable neither contractually nor by operation of law on debts. Use the “co-debtor stay” to protect the non-filing spouse on a limited joint debt(s), but only to give the filing spouse time to pay off the debt(s) in full so that there is no surviving liability at the end of the Chapter 13 case for which the non-filing spouse would continue to be liable.
Posted by Kevin on December 27, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Filing bankruptcy with or without your spouse affects the protection from creditors each of you receives, and also affects whether you file under Chapter 7 or 13.
_________________________
Continuing from the last month’s blog:
- There are consequences to filing separately or together, consequences affecting:
- protection from your creditors’ collection activity.
_________________________
Bankruptcy Only Protects Bankruptcy Filers, Right?
Start with the sensible proposition that if you want bankruptcy protection from your creditors, you need to file bankruptcy to get it. Sounds obvious and sensible, but it’s only partly true.
It’s True in Chapter 7
If you file a Chapter 7 straight bankruptcy case by yourself—without your spouse—and one of your debts is owed by both you and your spouse, the creditor will be able to continue pursuing your spouse to pay that debt. That’s because the “automatic stay” which stops creditors from collecting debts immediately upon the filing of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy only protects the person who files. The section of the federal Bankruptcy Code which provides for the “automatic stay” says that it stops “any act to collect… a claim against the debtor.” And a “debtor” is a person who has filed a bankruptcy case.
So if your spouse did not join in your bankruptcy case (and didn’t file his or her separate case), nothing stops this spouse’s creditors from pursuing the debts owed by him or her. And that includes debts that the two of you owe jointly. That’s the simple reason that usually married folks file joint bankruptcies—besides any individual debts each may have, most spouses have joint debts which both spouses need protection from.
But Chapter 13 Could Protect a Non-Filing Spouse
Bankruptcy CAN protect a co-obligor, such as a spouse, in a limited but potentially crucial way, ONLY under Chapter 13. The “co-debtor stay” of Chapter 13 extends the “automatic stay” immediately upon the filing of the case not just to the filing “debtor” but to also to co-debtors—any individual that is liable on a consumer debt with the debtor. A spouse who does not join the other spouse’s bankruptcy filing is a protected by this “co-debtor stay” as to any of their joint consumer debts.
But this protection comes with conditions. If the creditor challenges the co-debtor stay as to the non-filing spouse, the bankruptcy court will allow the creditor to pursue him or her EXCEPT to the extent the filing spouse is paying that debt through the Chapter 13 case. So the filing spouse can fully protect the non-filing spouse by arranging through the Chapter 13 plan to pay that debt in full. That way the debt is slowly paid off during the 3-to-5-year plan while both are protected from collections—the filing spouse by the “automatic stay” and the non-filing spouse by the “co-debtor stay.” Chapter 13 debtors are generally allowed to favor such consumer joint debts in their plans over other non-joint debts in order to protect co-debtor. So if the amount of such joint debt is relatively modest, this can be a way for only one spouse to file bankruptcy and still protect the other spouse from a joint creditor or two.
Since the “co-debtor stay” is available only under Chapter 13, if there are good reasons for only one spouse to file bankruptcy, and both spouses are liable on a limited amount of consumer debt, then Chapter 13 could well be the better option.
Posted by on December 16, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
A Chapter 13 case is often the preferred way to keep a sole proprietorship business alive. But can a regular Chapter 7 one ever do the same?
In my last blog I said that “if you own an ongoing business as a DBA… which you intend to keep operating, Chapter 7 may be a risky option.” Why? Because Chapter 7 is a “liquidating bankruptcy,” so the bankruptcy trustee could make you surrender any valuable components of your business, thereby jeopardizing the viability of the business. But this deserves further exploration.
Your Assets in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
When a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is filed, everything the debtor owns is considered to be part of the bankruptcy “estate.” A bankruptcy trustee oversees this estate. One of his or her primary tasks is to determine whether this estate has any assets worth collecting and distributing to creditors. Often there are no estate assets to collect and distribute because the debtor can protect, or “exempt,” certain categories and amounts of assets. The exempt assets continue to belong to the debtor and can’t be taken by the trustee for distribution to the creditors. The purpose of these “exemptions” is to let people filing bankruptcy keep a minimum amount of assets to get a “fresh start”.
Business Assets in a Chapter 7 Case
If you own a sole proprietorship, are all the assets of that business exempt and protected? In other words, is the entire value of the business covered by exemptions, whether approaching the business as a “going concern” or broken up into its distinct assets.
Many very small businesses cannot be sold as an ongoing business because they are operated by and completely reliant for their survival on the services of its one or two owners. In most such situations the business only has value when broken into its distinct assets. So the Chapter 7 trustee must consider whether the debtor has exempted all of these business assets to put them out of the trustee’s reach.
The assets of a very small business may include tools and equipment, receivables (money owed by customers for goods or services previously provided), supplies, inventory, and cash on hand or in an account. Sometimes the business may also have some value in a brand name or trademark, a below-market lease, or perhaps in some other unusual asset.
Whether a business’ assets are exempt depends on the nature and value of those assets, and on the particular exemptions that the law provides for them. For example, a very small business may truly own nothing more than a modest amount of office equipment and supplies, and/or receivables. In these situations the applicable state or federal “tool of trade” or “wildcard” exemptions may protect all the business assets. You need to work conscientiously with your attorney to make certain that all the assets are covered.
So it is possible for a business-owning debtor to have a no-asset Chapter 7 case, potentially allowing the business to pass through the case unscathed.
The Potential Liability Risks of the Business
However, there is an additional issue: will the trustee allow the business to continue to operate during the (usually) three-four months that a no-asset case is open or instead try to force the business to be shut down because of its potential liability risks for the trustee?
How could the Chapter 7 trustee be able to shut down the business? Recall that everything that a debtor owns, including his or her business, becomes part of the bankruptcy estate. As the technical owner—even if only temporarily—of the business, the trustee becomes potentially liable for damages caused by the business while the Chapter 7 case is open. For example, if a debtor who is a roofing subcontractor drops a load of shingles on someone during the Chapter 7 case, the estate, and thus the trustee, may be liable for the injuries.
The main factors that come into play are whether the business has sufficient liability insurance, and the extent to which the business is of the type prone to generating liabilities. There’s a lot of room for the trustees’ discretion in such matters, so knowing the particular trustee’s inclinations can be very important. That’s one of many reasons why a debtor needs to be represented by an experienced and conscientious attorney who knows all of the trustees on the local Chapter 7 trustee panel and how they deal with this issue.
Conclusion
In many situations it IS risky to file a Chapter 7 case when you want to continue operating a business. You need to be confident that the business assets are exempt from the bankruptcy estate, and that in your situation the trustee will not require the closing of the business to avoid any potential business liability.
Posted by Kevin on November 6, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
The Cast of Characters
You—the Debtor
A Chapter 7 debtor is looked at quite differently from a Chapter 13 debtor. Focusing here on one main difference, Chapter 7 fixates on who you are financially at the moment your case is filed. Chapter 13 focuses not only on that moment, but also who you are financially for the next the three to five years (the length of your payment plan).
For example, if you started earning a higher income a year after your case is filed, that would have no effect if you had filed a Chapter 7 case. But in a Chapter 13 case, that income increase would likely increase what you’d have to pay your creditors. On the other hand, because Chapter 7 pretty much doesn’t get involved in your future, it also doesn’t protect your future income from certain potentially dangerous debts which are not written off, such as certain taxes and child and spousal support arrearage. Chapter 13 does protect such future income. It allows you to pay these kinds of special debts based on your budget instead of leaving you at the mercy of those creditors’ aggressive collection powers.
Your Primary Challenger—the Trustee
In both Chapters 7 and 13, most likely the person you would have the most contact with would be the trustee. They are carefully selected and supervised individuals who are assigned to your case to take care of certain tasks. I called them your “challengers” because that’s their primary job, but most of the time your attorney and you will work cooperatively with them.
The Chapter 7 trustee’s most important task is to determine whether or not he or she has the right to take anything from you—in other word whether everything that you own is “exempt,” meaning that you can keep it all, as is usually the case. The Chapter 13 trustee’s two primary tasks are to raise any appropriate challenges to your proposed payment plan, and then, once a plan is approved by the bankruptcy judge, to distribute to creditors payments that you make under that plan.
Your Adversaries—the Creditors
Under both Chapter 7 and 13, your creditors can play a major role but often don’t. They can challenge your ability to discharge (write-off) their debts, and can raise a variety of objections. Often, we don’t hear from them at all, but if we do it’s usually a secured creditor (one who has a right to collateral such as your home or vehicle) or a special “priority” creditor—a taxing authority or support enforcement agency. How the various kinds of creditors are handled in Chapter 7 vs. 13 will be discussed in future blogs.
The Enforcer—the U.S. Trustee
This is an office under the U.S. Department of Justice which administers and, to a large degree, oversees the whole system, including the Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 trustees. You will usually not hear directly from them, and if you do it’s usually not good news, indicating that you or your paperwork are not following the rules.
The Paper-Pusher—the Bankruptcy Clerk
This is the office where we file the bankruptcy documents (which is virtually all done electronically, not by paper being physically delivered anywhere). They send out the official bankruptcy court notices.
The Deciders—the Bankruptcy Judges
A bankruptcy judge is assigned to every Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 case, but mostly they work behind the scenes. You will almost never actually go to the judge’s courtroom in a Chapter 7 case, and seldom in a Chapter 13 case.
In most Chapter 7 cases, a judge is hardly involved, except in signing the discharge order releasing you from your debts at the completion of your case, assuming that it proceeded appropriately. In the relatively unusual situation of a creditor objecting to the discharge of its debt, the bankruptcy judge will decide whether the objection meets the relatively limited grounds for a debt not to be discharged.
In contrast, a judge is always involved in a Chapter 13 case, at the very least in the approval of your payment plan at what is called the confirmation hearing. But again, you almost never need to attend this hearing, which is taken care of by your attorney. Because of the length of a Chapter 13 case, it’s more likely than in a Chapter 7 case that issues will arise that need the judge’s attention—changes in your plan if your circumstances change, challenges by creditors or the trustee if you are not meeting the terms of your plan, and such. Chapter 13 is a 3-5 year journey that you take with the court, the trustee, your creditors and most importantly, your attorney. So a word to the wise, make your payments in a timely manner and stay in close communication with your attorney throughout your case so that you know whether issues are being put before your judge and how he or she is deciding them.
Posted by Kevin on November 3, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
In deciding between Chapter 7 and 13, get this question out of the way right away: “Can I keep everything I own if I file a Chapter 7 case?”
_________________________
Most people do not lose anything that they own when they file bankruptcy. That’s because the law protects (“exempts”) certain kinds of your assets and usually a certain dollar value of them. If everything you own fits within those kinds and those amounts, then you can file a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy” and protect everything. Even if you DO own and want to keep things beyond those limits, filing a Chapter 13 case will likely protect those additional things. So, a way to put the question is whether 1) all your possessions are protected under Chapter 7 or instead 2) you need the extra protection provided by Chapter 13.
(This blog is about things you own free and clear. Those that are collateral on debts, such as your home with its mortgage, are a whole separate discussion for later.)
_________________________
This is a good first question once you start seriously considering bankruptcy because usually your attorney will be able to answer it quite quickly and assure your possessions are protected in a Chapter 7 case. And if some are not protected, that’s an issue that should be addressed by your attorney and you from the very beginning.
Just because your attorney can usually make this determination quite quickly does not mean that it is not an important question, or that it’s an easy one for someone who isn’t highly experienced in this area of law.
It’s an important question because:
1) If you’re filing bankruptcy you likely can’t spare to lose what you own, so you don’t want to put any of it at risk.
2) You especially don’t want to lose something unnecessarily, since there usually are ways to prevent that from happening.
It’s not an easy question for the inexperienced because:
1) In some states the state law determines what you can keep, while in some other states federal law does, and in others either state or federal law can apply.
2) After knowing which law applies, the asset categories are often not clearly stated in the statutes, and their meaning can turn on court interpretations or even on the informal practices of the local bankruptcy trustees or judges.
3) The laws change—the statutes, the formal court interpretations, and the informal practices, and it is very difficult to keep up with all this without working with it full time.
4) If you moved from another state, the statutes and court interpretations applicable to your former state may or may not apply.
And if everything you own is NOT protected, then Chapter 13 MAY be a great tool for keeping everything. But here are some good questions to ask your attorney in this situation:
1) Are the substantial extra time and cost of a Chapter 13 case worth this benefit?
2) Can those unprotected assets be more efficiently protected by some appropriate pre-bankruptcy planning?
3) Can those assets be protected in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy by paying a reasonable amount to the bankruptcy trustee—in reasonable monthly payments—while avoiding the extra hassles of a Chapter 13 payment plan?
4) If you would pay such money to the trustee, where would that money go, and might at least some of it go where it would benefit you—such as to pay taxes or some other debt that you would not be written off by the Chapter 7 case so you would have to pay anyway?
5) And lastly, would Chapter 13 help you in other ways beyond protecting your assets, so that overall it would be worthwhile?
Posted by Kevin on October 30, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Chapter 13 costs much more than Chapter 7, takes about 10 times as long, so you do a Chapter 7 if possible, right?
No. These two options each have advantages and disadvantages that need to be carefully matched to your immediate and long-term goals. The greater cost of Chapter 13 sometimes is far outweighed by what you may save through that procedure—possibly even by tens of thousands of dollars. The length of Chapter 13 can itself be an advantage when you’re trying to buy time or stretch payments out over a longer period to lower their monthly amount. But in other situations, Chapter 7 may be just what you need.
Be Informed, But Be Open-Minded
It’s good to inform yourself in advance about these options. But it’s also wise to have an open mind when you first go to see an attorney for legal advice. You may simply not know about a crucial advantage or disadvantage that could swing your decision one way or the other. And you don’t want to be too emotionally invested in going in one direction when the other may be a better choice.
Easy Choice, Hard Choice
Sometimes your circumstances and/or your goals push your decision strongly in one direction or the other. Sometimes you may even only qualify for one, and that one provides what you need. Or you may qualify for both, but still everything points towards either Chapter 7 or 13. In either situation, it could be a very easy choice.
But often you could go through either a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 case AND BOTH may have attractive features. So it can come down to a deeply personal choice.
For Example…
A couple of simple examples will make this clearer.
If you are behind on your home mortgage and want to hang onto the home, a Chapter 7 case would likely write off all or most of your other debts. Then you’d likely have a few months to catch up on the mortgage. In contrast, a Chapter 13 case would give you up to 5 years to catch up. And it may allow you to avoid paying a second mortgage. This choice turns to some degree on factual issue like whether you have a second mortgage that could be “avoided,” and how much you’re behind on the mortgage payments. But on a personal level it comes down on how important it is to you to keep the house, and how much you’d be willing to bet that you’d be able to do that though Chapter 7 by negotiating a relatively quick catch-up of payments instead of getting much more time and far greater protection through Chapter 13.
Similarly, if you owed some recent income taxes that would not be written off under either Chapter, you could file a Chapter 7 case and write off all or most of your other debts so that you could focus your financial resources on the IRS. You’d arrange with the IRS to make monthly payments to pay off that tax debt, plus ongoing interest and penalties. Or you could file a Chapter 13 case and pay those taxes through a formal plan based on your own budget, usually avoiding additional interest and penalties, all the while being protected from the IRS. But you would pay extra fees for these advantages. This choice also depends on the facts, such as how much tax you owe and how much you would be able afford to pay each month once your Chapter 7 case were completed. But then it comes down to the more personal question of how confident you’d be that your present income and expenses would stay stable throughout the repayment period, so that you could make those payments no matter what.
It’s Good to Have a Choice, Even If It’s Not an Easy One
To be honest, it is not unusual for people to have some factors pointing towards Chapter 7 with others pointing towards Chapter 13. But instead of wringing your hands about having tough choices, realize it is usually a good thing to have more than one choice, even if neither is perfect. An experienced, conscientious attorney will walk you through this, help you prioritize your goals, weigh any risks, and give you what you need so that you can confidently make a smart choice.
Coming Right Up…
Because being informed is a good thing, and because this decision between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 is so important, the next few blogs will look at both the basic and some more subtle differences between them.
Posted by Kevin on October 28, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Why Does Chapter 13 Have Debt Limits?
Chapter 7 has no debt limit. But the Bankruptcy Code does impose a limit on the amount of debt that person can owe when filing a Chapter 13 case. Why? Although in conventional consumer situations an average Chapter 7 case is much quicker and easier than an average Chapter 13 case, in fact Chapter 7 can be used with a wide variety of business and consumer arenas, including for corporations and partnerships, including those with many millions of dollars of debt. Chapter 13 is a tremendously flexible procedure, but it is still a relatively streamlined one—especially compared to Chapter 11 reorganization. It was specifically designed for individuals and married couples with relatively straightforward debts.
The primary way that the law tries to limit Chapter 13 to simpler cases is with debt limits. Currently the individual filing one, or the married couple filing together, must have less than $383,175 in total unsecured debts and ALSO less than $1,149,525 in secured debts.
What’s with the Odd Amounts?
These dollar limits do sound arbitrary, and to some extent they are, simply reflecting a Congressional compromise going back 34 years to the original passage of the Bankruptcy Code in 1978. The limits back then were only $100,000 unsecured debt and $350,000 secured debt. These didn’t change until more than doubling in 1994 to $250,000 and $750,000, respectively, with inflationary increases every three years thereafter. The current amounts have been in effect since April 1, 2013.
What Are “Noncontingent, Liquidated Debts”?
The statute specifically says that you “may be a debtor under Chapter 13” only if you owe, “on the date of the filing of the petition, noncontingent, liquidated, unsecured debts of less than $383,175 and noncontingent, liquidated, secured debts of less than $1,149,525” (with the appropriate current amounts inserted).
To be a bit over simplistic, these two descriptive words are intended to make clear that only real debts count for these limits. “Noncontingent” means that you are presently liable on the debt, not liable only if some event does or does not occur. “Liquidated” means that you owe a specific and determinable amount. A contingent debt would include one that you would only owe if somebody else did not pay it. A noncontingent debt would be one which you owe jointly with someone else but the creditor has no obligation to first pursue the other debtor. An unliquidated debt would include a lawsuit against you for unspecified damages; a liquidated debt could be a lawsuit where the alleged debt amount can be determined, even if it might be disputed.
Conclusion
In most cases, you will either be clearly under both secured and unsecured debt limits or clearly over one of them. But if you are at all close, be aware that these “noncontingent, unliquidated” distinctions are not always clear. And even if you are over the limits, there may be other solutions if you really need the benefits of a Chapter 13. One possibility is filing a so-called “Chapter 20”—filing a Chapter 7 case to discharge much of your debts, followed immediately by filing a Chapter 13 (7 + 13 = 20). The Chapter 7 discharge should get you under the Chapter 13 debt limits, and then although the Chapter 13 cannot discharge any more debts, it could well protect you from your remaining creditors as you pay their debts—such as mortgage arrearage, back child support, or taxes—at your own schedule.
Posted by Kevin on October 24, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
The amount of your income alone may not disqualify you from Chapter 7.
The last blog said that:
• You can avoid the “means test” altogether if more than half of your debts are business debts—they were NOT incurred “primarily for a personal, family, or household purpose.”
• When comparing your “income” for the “means test” against the applicable “median family income,” your “income” is based on virtually all the money you receive during the previous six-full-calendar-month period. Which six months make up that period depends when you file, meaning that you may have some control over your “income” and whether or not is it above the “median family income” amount.
• But even if your “income” is indeed higher than your applicable “median family income,” that’s just the beginning of the “means test.”
So here are the remaining steps of the “means test,” each step giving you another opportunity to pass it and qualify for Chapter 7. Be forewarned: these additional steps are not the easiest to understand:
• You can deduct certain living expenses from your monthly “income” to see if your “monthly disposable income” is low enough. Unfortunately, the rules for determining what expenses you may deduct and how much for each are almost unbelievably complicated. It would take pages and pages to explain. For just a taste of this, the allowed amounts for some types of expenses are based on what you actually spend, some are based on tables of local standards amounts, others on national standards. For our present purposes, what counts is that after applying those rules, if the amount left over—the “monthly disposable income”—is no more than $117, then you can still file Chapter 7.
• If your “monthly disposable income” after deducting expenses is between $117 and $195, then the following formula is applied. Multiply your “monthly disposable income” by 60. Then compare that amount to the total amount of your regular (non-priority) unsecured debts. If the multiplied amount is not enough to pay at least 25% of those debts, then you can file Chapter 7.
• If after applying the above formula you CAN pay at least 25% of those debts, OR if after deducting your allowed living expenses the resulting “monthly disposable income” is more than $195, then you can still file under Chapter 7 by showing “special circumstances.” Examples of appropriate “special circumstances” in the Bankruptcy Code are “a serious medical condition or a call or order to active duty in the Armed Forces.” So, be forewarned. Special circumstances is very limited in scope.
The previous blog showed that even the relatively simple first step of the “means test”—comparing your “income” to the “median family income”—has its unexpected twists and turns. Today we’ve seen that if your “income” is indeed too high for that first step, there are other steps to the “means test” which—although admittedly complex—which may get you successfully through Chapter 7.
On a practical level, the amendments to the Bankruptcy Code make filing bankruptcy more expensive for the debtor. Not only are there additional monies required for filing fees, courses and due diligence, there is substantial additional attorney time associated with filing even Chapter 7. Completing the means test and justifying the result to a trust is one of those areas.
Posted by Kevin on October 19, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you don’t qualify for either Chapter 7 or 13, do you have to do a very expensive Chapter 11 reorganization?
Chapter 11 is dreadfully expensive. That’s part of the reason why consumers seldom file them compared to Chapter 7 and 13. The court filing fee alone is $1,233 . The attorney fees can be tens of thousands of dollars. Why so expensive? Because Chapter 11 was designed for large corporate reorganizations, and, in spite of efforts to streamline it for smaller businesses and for individuals, it’s a cumbersome, attorney-intensive procedure. So it is usually sensible to avoid Chapter 11 if either Chapter 7 or 13 will serve your needs.
But what if you’re disqualified from those other two? If you really ARE disqualified, then you may have to file under Chapter 11. But you may not be disqualified even if at first you think you are. So let’s look more closely at the qualification rules, especially as they apply to situations where at first it may look like you don’t qualify. Today we’ll give a broad overview about this as to both Chapter 7 and 13, and then in the next two blogs we’ll look more closely at each one.
Chapter 7 and the “Means Test”
The point of the quite complicated means test is to make people pay a meaningful amount of their debts if they have the “means” to do so. So those who do not pass the means test cannot file a Chapter 7 “straight bankruptcy,” or they can be forced out if. Instead they would usually have to proceed through Chapter 13, and be required to pay what they could afford to pay to their creditors over the following five years.
But the means test is often misunderstood. That’s not surprising given its multiple steps and odd combination of rigid formulas and discretionary enforcement. The following may help you understand it and potentially get around it:
- The means test may not even apply to you. It only applies to individuals with “primarily consumer debts,” meaning that you skip the means test altogether if half or more of your debts were incurred for business purposes instead of “primarily for a personal, family, or household purpose.”
- There’s a fixation on the first step of the means test—whether your income is above or below the “median family income” amount for your state and household size. Indeed a large majority of people who file Chapter 7 DO have lower income than the applicable median income. So they can skip the rest of the means test.
- The means test uses an odd and very specific definition of your income, one which focuses on the six-full-calendar-month prior to whatever date your Chapter 7 case is filed. This means that for many people their “income” shifts with each passing month, depending on the changes to their income of the past 6 or so months. So some careful tactical planning may enable you to fit under the median income amount by filing at the right time.
- Even if your income, as appropriately defined, is in fact over the applicable median income, that’s just the beginning of the analysis. There are a number of other steps to the means test, each with potential ways to pass the means test and qualify for Chapter 7. We’ll go through these additional steps in the next blog.
The Chapter 13 Debt Limits
At the time of filing a Chapter 13 case, your total unsecured debts must be less than $383,175, and your total secured debts must be less than $1,149,525.
As you can probably guess, there’s more to this than immediately meets the eye. For a start, the terms actually used by the statute for these limits are “noncontingent, liquidated secured debts” and “noncontingent, liquidated unsecured debts.”
Debtors with relatively high debt are often present or former business owners who signed personal guarantees for corporate debt. When are those guaranteed debts considered contingent and therefore would not count towards the debt limits, and when are they noncontingent so that they would count? And when is an unresolved claim against the debtor considered unliquidated so that they would not count towards the debt limits, and when are they liquidated so that they would count?
What these Chapter 13 debt limits really mean will be the topic two blogs from now.
Posted by Kevin on September 28, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you were already on the financial edge and just found out you owe a bunch of income taxes, here is how bankruptcy can help.
If you owed nobody but the IRS for last year’s income taxes, you wouldn’t likely need to think about filing any kind of bankruptcy. In many circumstances, the IRS is actually reasonably decent to work with, such as in setting up a monthly payment plan for catching up on a single year’s tax shortfall. Sure, you’ll pay some penalties and interest, but if you can pay it all off in reasonable monthly payments in the next year or so, that wouldn’t be such a bad thing.
But if you owe for more than one year, or are just filing for the 2012 tax year on extension, and still owe for 2013, then it looks like you’re getting into a vicious cycle. And if on top of that, you have a whole bunch of other debts, you owe it to yourself to check out Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 as possible ways out of that vicious cycle. Today we’ll briefly explore how Chapter 7 helps, and then how Chapter 13 does in the next blog.
Chapter 7 and Income Taxes
You may well have other reasons for choosing to file a Chapter 7 instead of a Chapter 13, but the rule of thumb as far as taxes is pretty simple, especially if the only taxes you owe are from the last year or two:
File a Chapter 7 case if after doing so you will be able to get caught up on your back and current taxes through manageable monthly payments made over a reasonable period of time. In other words, file a Chapter 7 if you don’t need the extra protection and benefits provided by Chapter 13.
Both Chapter 7 and 13 can legally write off (“discharge”) income taxes, but can never do so until at least three years from the time the tax returns for those years were due to be filed (including extensions, if any). So as of now you could discharge 2008 income taxes, and 2009 taxes that were filed on April 15. but not later ones. That’s because 2008 taxes were due either April 15, 2009 or October 15, 2009 depending on whether you got an extension, and you could discharge a 2008 tax debt starting three years later, after April 15, 2012 or after October 15, 2012. You could discharge the 2009 tax debt if you filed on April 15, 2010. If you filed your tax return on October 15, 2010, you could not discharge the tax obligation if you filed Chapter 7 today (but you may be able to discharge if you held off your bankrutpcy filing to after October 15, 2013). You’d have to meet some additional conditions as well, but this three-year condition is a good starting point.
So unless you currently owe income taxes going back further than 2009, Chapter 7 is not going to discharge any of them. That does not mean that Chapter 7 is without benefit, though. The benefit it will give you is discharging all or most of your other debts. So the analysis we will go through with you when you meet with us involves two questions:
1) How much will filing Chapter 7 improve your monthly cash flow? In other words, how much will you be able to pay to the IRS realistically on a monthly basis, both to catch up on the back taxes and to make any necessary adjustments to the current withholdings or estimated quarterly payments?
2) How much do you owe in back taxes? Will the amount that you can realistically afford to pay each month enable you to get current in a reasonable time (so you’re doing so within the length of time the IRS will allow, and without incurring a crippling amount in additional penalties and interest)?
Unless we confidently believe that Chapter 7 will solve your tax problem, we’ll look at whether Chapter 13 would do better. It’s wise to consider Chapter 13 regardless, so you’ll know the advantages and disadvantages of both options. See the next blog for that.
Posted by Kevin on September 22, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you need bankruptcy protection but already filed a bankruptcy case within the last few years, you may still be able to file a new one now.
There are some strict rules about when you can file a bankruptcy case after having filed a previous one. But as with so many other areas of law, there are opportunities when we look more closely.
Previous Bankruptcy Filing vs. Discharge
It’s not necessarily previously FILED bankruptcy cases that count, but only ones in which you received a DISCHARGE of your debts. All the timing rules in the Bankruptcy Code dealing with when you can file a new case refer to the length of time since “the debtor has been granted a discharge” or “has received a discharge” in the previous bankruptcy case.
In other words, if your previous case was not successfully completed—it was dismissed before you finished it—that case would not prevent you from filing a case now, no matter how long or short of a time since that previous case was filed.
So make sure—absolutely sure—that you got a discharge in your earlier bankruptcy case. If you distinctly remember that your case finished the way it was supposed to, you very likely DID get a discharge. But you definitely want to make sure. Find out from your former attorney. Or dig up the discharge order issued by the Bankruptcy Court from your old paperwork, or we can likely find out for you when you come in for your initial consultation.
The Timing Rules
If you’ve heard that you have to wait 8 years between bankruptcy filings, be aware that only applies to one of a number of possible scenarios: the length of time from the previous discharged Chapter 7 case to the filing of a new Chapter 7 case.
If your previous case was a Chapter 7 one and you now want to file a Chapter 13 case, the applicable length of time is only 4 years.
If your previous case was a Chapter 13 one and you now want to file a Chapter 7 case, the length of time is only 6 years. And in fact if that previous Chapter 13 case was one in which your unsecured creditors were paid at least 70% of their debts, then there is NO limitation on filing a Chapter 7 case afterwards.
And if your previous case was a Chapter 13 one and you now want to file a Chapter 13 case, the applicable length of time is only 2 years.
And very important: on all of these the clock starts running NOT at the time of discharge—generally at the end of a case—but rather earlier, at the date of filing at the very beginning of the prior case. So what count is the date of filing of the prior case to the date of filing the new case. For example, if your previous case was a Chapter 13 one that was filed on October 1, 2006, and it took five years to complete so that the discharge was entered on October 1, 2011, you would be able to file a Chapter 7 case starting October 1, 2012.
Why File a Bankruptcy Case If You Can’t Get a Discharge?
So if you need bankruptcy protection but not enough time has passed, you can still file the case but you just won’t receive a discharge of your debts. Why would you ever want to do that?
Probably never for a Chapter 7 case, since almost always the main benefit of a Chapter 7 case is the discharge of your debts.
But Chapter 13 provides a number of other benefits distinct from the discharge of debts. For example, it stops a foreclosure and gives you years to catch up on your mortgage arrears. It also stops extremely aggressive collection of unpaid support payments, including the suspension of professional/occupational/driver’s licenses, again giving you years to bring it current. It may be able to significantly reduce what you pay for your vehicle through a “cram down.” For these and other reasons it can make a lot of sense to file a Chapter 13 case while knowing that you’ll not get a discharge of any of your debts. You may not even have any debts to discharge, but just need one or more of those other powerful benefits.
In fact that’s usually the situation with the so-called “Chapter 20.” This usually involves, first, the filing of a Chapter 7 case, which results in the discharge of most of the debtor’s debts. Then, second, immediately after that’s done, a Chapter 13 is filed to use one or more of its benefits. (Chapter 7 + 13 = 20.) Since most of the debts were discharged in the prior Chapter 7, the debtor doesn’t need a discharge in the Chapter 13 case.
This blog should make it clear that a simple rule—8 years from one bankruptcy to the next one—is often woefully incomplete and misleading. In addition, there are complicated rules concerning whether the automatic stay will apply in case involving multiple filings. This is another good argument that you truly need to talk with an attorney who focuses on bankruptcy instead of making misassumptions that could cause you lots of unnecessary grief.
Posted by Kevin on September 11, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
If you’re behind on child or spousal support, the support enforcement agency can be extremely aggressive. Chapter 7 doesn’t help much. Chapter 13 CAN.
In most states an ex-spouse—or the state’s support enforcement agency acting on his or her behalf—has extraordinary ways to collect on current and back support obligations. These include not just ways of getting directly at your money, but also ways to hurt you with the intent of forcing you to pay.
So we’re not just talking about garnishing your wages and bank accounts, taking away income tax refunds, or putting liens on your real estate. We’re talking coercive action. Your driver’s license can be suspended. This includes your commercial driver’s license, so that you can’t work if you’re a truck driver or have any other job requiring that license. Your professional or occupational license could also be suspended, preventing you from legally working in your profession or business as a nurse, doctor, realtor, insurance agent, mortgage broker, lawyer, or even in some places athletic trainer or funeral director!
There’s more. Your hunting, fishing, boating and other recreational licenses could be revoked. You can even be denied a U.S. passport.
Chapter 7 Gives Very Limited Help
“Straight bankruptcy” under Chapter 7 unfortunately does not stop any of these collection methods. The “automatic stay” that stops just about all other collection efforts has an exception for child and spousal support. (See Section 362(b)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code.) The only way that Chapter 7 can help is that it can often legally write off (“discharge”) all or most of your other debt so that you would have the money to pay your support. But that does not help deal with your financial emergency if you’re in the support enforcement’s crosshairs.
Chapter 13 CAN Help Where it Counts the Most
The filing of a Chapter 13—the three-to-five-year “adjustment of debts” kind of bankruptcy—DOES stop all these aggressive ways of collecting on support obligations. The “automatic stay” does apply in most respects to Chapter 13, as long as it affects the collection of your assets that did not exist at the time your case is filed, such as future income. But to make this protection last more than just a few days or weeks, you must rigorously meet a number of conditions:
- Your Chapter 13 plan must show that you are going to catch up on all the back support during the life of the plan. And then you must make your monthly plan payments on time to show that your plan is feasible and that the back support will in fact be paid in full.
- Your budget must show that you will be able to start (or continue) making the regular monthly divorce court ordered support payments, AND then you must actually pay those on time. And that starts with the first one that is legally due on whichever day it’s due immediately after your Chapter 13 is filed, and then every month thereafter.
- At the end of your Chapter 13 case you must certify that you are current on your ongoing support payments, or else you cannot complete your case and get a discharge of your remaining debts.
On the positive side, Chapter 13 neutralizes most of the extremely dangerous firepower of your ex-spouse or the support enforcement agency, and gives you the opportunity to solve an otherwise very difficult problem. Chapter 13 is often a great tool for catching up on your back support, because you are allowed to favor that debt over just about every other one. You could end up paying very little if anything else to your other creditors, except those other ones that matter to you, such as your mortgage, vehicle loan, taxes and such.
But you must be financially able to meet the above conditions, and then strictly abide by them. If during the Chapter 13 case you miss one of your regular monthly support payments, or one of your plan payments, you can expect your ex-spouse or support enforcement to ask the bankruptcy judge for “relief from the automatic stay,” that is, for permission to resume or even intensify their earlier collection efforts. At that point the judges will tend not to be very sympathetic to you, since you are not complying with the conditions that you had agreed to at the beginning of your case.
Posted by Kevin on August 26, 2013 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Bankruptcy stops a vehicle repo from happening. But what then?
Vehicle loan creditors can be very aggressive about repossessing their collateral—that vehicle which happens to be your crucial means of transportation. They are probably so impatient because this kind of collateral is so mobile and easy to hide. Plus the creditors’ decades of experience probably tell them the longer they wait the less likely they’ll be able to find the vehicle, and have it still be in decent condition.
So, most vehicle loan contracts give the creditors the right to repossess as soon as you’re in default on your agreement, which means as soon as you miss a single monthly payment. But for a variety of practical reasons, they don’t tend to pop cars that fast, usually letting you get 30 or maybe 60 or even more days late, depending on a bunch of factors such as your payment history, whether and what you’re communicating with them, and the value and condition of the vehicle.
In your own circumstances you probably have a decent feel for when you should be getting worried about a possible car or truck repo. If you are concerned, you may feel better that one of the most powerful tools of bankruptcy—the “automatic stay”—can stop the repo man in his tracks. That’s the law that automatically goes into effect the moment your bankruptcy case is filed at court to stay—or stop—all collection activity against you or your property, including the repossession of collateral.
But assuming you file a bankruptcy and stop a repo before it happens, what happens next? The two different consumer bankruptcy options each help in different ways. The rest of today’s blog is about how Chapter 7 helps in this situation, and the next blog will be how Chapter 13 does.
Right after filing a Chapter 7 case you have to decide whether you want to and can afford to keep the vehicle, or instead will surrender it. (This is part of what we would discuss with you before your case is filed.)
If you want to keep your car or truck you will likely need to catch up on any late payments very quickly–within a month or two after your Chapter 7 was filed. The vast majority of vehicle loan creditors will only give you that much time. (The exceptions tend to be local lenders, perhaps with less expensive vehicles for which the debt is much higher than the value of the vehicle, so they have more reason to be flexible.)
Part of the reason the creditors are in a hurry to get you current is that this reduces their financial exposure compared to the value of the vehicle.
There is also a very practical bit of timing involved. To keep the vehicle, you will be required to sign a “reaffirmation agreement,” which is filed at the bankruptcy court. That agreement formally excludes the vehicle loan from the discharge of your debts. So understandably bankruptcy law requires the “reaffirmation agreement” to be filed at court before your debts are discharged. And the court order discharging all your debts is entered most of the time about three months after your case is filed. So you can see why your creditor wants you to be current on your loan before that “reaffirmation agreement” is prepared and filed at court.
If you don’t anticipate being able to bring the vehicle loan current that quickly—either with the Chapter 7 filing gaining you enough additional cash flow or from some other source—but you still need to keep the vehicle, Chapter 13 is often an excellent solution, as will be discussed in the next blog.
Assuming for the moment that Chapter 13 is not a viable option, and that you can’t pay the back payment(s) in time, you need to consider surrendering the vehicle. There are certain advantages to surrender—especially in the midst of your Chapter 7 case—that you should fully understand even if at first it doesn’t sound like a good idea.
Surrendering the vehicle:
- gets you out of the monthly payments (and also the cost of the insurance premiums)
- avoids needing to find the money to pay the accrued late payments and related late fees and other possible charges
- discharges any “deficiency balance,” the amount that you would owe if you had surrendered the vehicle without bankruptcy—after the creditor sold it, credited the sale proceeds to the balance, and came after you for the remaining balance.
Please return here in a couple days to read how Chapter 13 can help you keep your vehicle.
