Posted by Kevin on July 11, 2012 under Bankruptcy Blog | 
In bankruptcy it’s okay to FEEL differently towards some creditors than others. You can also sometimes ACT differently, but only if you very carefully follow the rules.
OK. You are in financial difficulty. You may or may not even have thought seriously about bankruptcy, however. You have lots of creditors and a small amount of money. Some of those creditors are family members- and you have to take care of them. Others are people that you do with business. You would like to take care of them because you want to keep up that relationship. Are there any hidden land mines if you bankruptcy after paying back your cousin, Vinnie, of your main supplier?
The problem with favoring certain creditors is that doing so flies in the face of one of the basic principles of bankruptcy law—that creditors which are legally the same should be treated the same. Mostly that applies to how creditors are treated DURING the bankruptcy case itself. But in certain limited but crucial ways this principle spills over into the time BEFORE your case is filed. Payments you made to a creditor can be undone—the creditor can be forced to pay to the bankruptcy trustee whatever you paid to the creditor within a certain period of time before your bankruptcy filing.
The practical consequences of this can be devastating. You make a special effort to pay someone that you care about, likely when you don’t have much money, only to later risk having your bankruptcy trustee make that person pay that money “back,” not to you but rather to the trustee. Since this can happen long after you paid that creditor, the money you paid probably has long ago been spent, often leaving that creditor scrambling.
If you pay a creditor not long before filing the bankruptcy case, the theory is that you “preferred” that creditor over others. The inappropriate payments are called “preference payments,” or simply “preferences.” The idea is that had you not made those payments, there would have been money to distribute to the creditors overall.
So what are the rules about this so that one can avoid them? If you’d like very effective sleep-inducing bedtime reading, here is Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code explaining preferences. Nearly 1,400 words, in 57 subsections and sub-subsections!
But the good news is that the basic rule is both reasonably straightforward and often easy to work around if you understand it. So here it is. A preference is a payment (usually money, but it can be any asset) made (voluntarily or involuntarily such as a garnishment) on a prior debt to a creditor (anybody to whom you legally owe money) during the period of 90 days before the filing of a bankruptcy. That period of time stretches out to a full year before filing for payments made to “insiders”—basically relatives, friends, and business associates.
So how do you work around this? Well, if you know about the rule in advance, you avoid paying creditors you care about during those 90-day and 1-year periods before filing, whichever is applicable. And if you’ve already made those payments, you avoid the problem by waiting to file long enough to get past those time periods.
There are other aspects that make this easier than it might sound. Payments to most secured debts (on your home, vehicle) don’t count. The trustee can’t chase payments to a single creditor totaling less than $600 in the case of a consumer debtor or less than $5,000 for a business debtor. And there are various other exceptions.
The bottom line is that overall it’s dangerous to pay creditors who you feel a special loyalty to before filing bankruptcy. The basic 90-day/1-year rule is rather simple, but it has lots of twists and turns so it’s safer to just avoid the issue whenever possible. Often it’s better to wait until after you file your bankruptcy case to pay these people. That’s the subject of the next blog.
Posted by Kevin on July 9, 2012 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Most experienced bankruptcy attorneys know that there is a moral consideration in filing bankruptcy. We know that many clients wrestle with the idea of whether it is morally right for them to file. Books are written about the bankruptcy filings of famous Americans through the years for the dual reasons of demonstrating that filing bankruptcy does not necessarily make you a bad person, and also to demonstrate the moral ambivalence that confronted these famous people when they filed bankruptcy.
You could consider the choice whether or not to file bankruptcy to simply be a “business decision.” Merely a weighing of the costs and benefits of filing and not filing. For many people, that is as far as it goes (and I do not have a problem with that). After all, corporations of all sizes file “strategic bankruptcies” all the time. Their very smart and well-informed managers decide that bankruptcy is the best way to reduce debt and streamline their operations, so that the business can survive and hopefully thrive into the future.
And who doesn’t want to survive and thrive?
But for you, it may not be that cut and dry. You consider yourself more than a business. More than a corporation. For you, the human costs and benefits have to be added into the equation.
For many people, the decision to file bankruptcy is more than a business decision. For many, that’s where morality comes into the decision. We humans are moral creatures. That means that our important choices include the moral assessment of the situation. If we don’t engage in the moral component of this choice, we may experience something akin to “buyer’s remorse”; that is, after the fact we look back and say to ourselves, “why did I do that”?
So what do you need to do to make a good moral decision?
First, accept the choices that you made—good and bad, sensible and short-sighted, intentional and forced—and review the circumstances that got you where you are now. Accept that you made a series of legal commitments to pay your debts, consider how much choice you had at the time about them, and in hindsight what you could have done differently, if anything. Analyse honestly why are you now not able to keep those commitments? Is it because you lost a job or because your spending habits, especially in the area of non-necessities, are out of control? By analyzing choices made, you are not only assessing whether to file bankruptcy, but you are putting yourself on the path not to repeat your mistakes.
Second, consider both the financial costs and benefits of bankruptcy versus the moral costs and benefits of continuing to try to meet those financial commitments. Yes, you can get my debts discharged. But, how will your family, friends, co-workers view you in the future.? Am you being an honest debtor or are you gaming the system? Or will it be viewed that you are gaming the system? Do you have a realistic chance of successfully paying off your debts, and even if so, what would be the likely human costs while doing so? And if you do not have a realistic chance, how do you weigh the benefit of putting up a good fight against the costs that come from just delaying the inevitable?
Third, recognize that you now have both the opportunity and obligation to make a good decision about whether to continue trying to meet those commitments. To just accept the status quo without facing the situation honestly and bravely is making a decision by default, which is likely neither your morally best nor practically wisest move. In other words, you should control your destiny rather than destiny controlling you.
Fourth, get advice so that you know your legal options. You cannot make decisions, whether business or mixed business and moral, without knowing the facts and the law. An experienced bankruptcy attorney not only knows the law, he or she knows what you are going through. More importantly, an experienced bankruptcy attorney can guide you to bankruptcy alternatives if that makes sense for you. You may have the best of all intentions, but with your hours at work cut back, lots of debts, and bill collectors badgering you at work and home, bankruptcy is probably your best and only realistic alternative. On the other hand, you may be a candidate for debt consolidation through a reputable non-profit debt counselor. Or you may have enough equity in your home to get a second mortgage and consolidate your debts. Finally, filing under Chapter 13, where you pay back a portion of your debt, may be economically feasible and fit into your notion of fairness and morality. One size does not fit all. An experienced bankruptcy attorney can put you in a position to make the right decision for you and your family.
Posted by Kevin on July 6, 2012 under Bankruptcy Blog |
Background:
- A creditor which has rights to collateral is called a “secured creditor.” Your obligation to pay what you owe to this creditor is secured by rights it has to take possession and ownership of the collateral if you don’t make your payments on the debt.
- In bankruptcy, secured creditors have a lot more leverage against you because of the collateral than do creditors without any collateral—“unsecured creditors.”
- If you want to keep the collateral, Chapter 7 is sometimes is your best choice, but in many circumstances Chapter 13 can give you more options.
- Secured debts in which the collateral is your home or your vehicle are governed by special rules because of how important those kinds of collateral are to most people.
- But you will not find many blogs talking about secured debts where the collateral is something other than your home or vehicle. The main secured debts of this type are probably furniture and appliance purchases, money loans secured by your own personal assets, and business loans secured by business and/or personal assets.
Cramdown:
- This tool applies only to Chapter 13—it can’t be done in Chapter 7.
- If the collateral securing a secured debt is worth less than the balance on that debt, then you may be able to divide that debt into two parts: the secured part—the amount of the debt up to the value of the collateral, and the unsecured part—the rest of the debt. An example will make that clear. Let’s say you owed $1,000 on a refrigerator, in which the purchase contract gave the creditor the right to repossess that refrigerator if you didn’t make the agreed payments. If the present value of that refrigerator is $600, then the secured portion of that debt would be $600, and the remaining $400 of that debt would the unsecured portion.
- In a Chapter 13 “cramdown” you pay not the total debt, but only the secured part of the debt. You pay the unsecured part of the debt only at the percentage that all the rest of your regular unsecured creditors are paid. That is usually less than 100% and can sometimes be a low as 0%. In the above example, the $1,000 total refrigerator debt is crammed down to $600, and the remaining $400 part of the debt is lumped in with the rest of your unsecured creditors. So if in your Chapter 13 plan your unsecured creditors are receiving 10%, then you would pay only the $600 secured portion, the remaining unsecured portion would get $40 spread out over the term of the plan, and would be discharged (written off) at the end of your Chapter 13 case.
THE cramdown rule with collateral other than your home or vehicle:
- “[I]f the debt was incurred during the 1-year period preceding [the bankruptcy] filing” then you cannot do a cramdown on collateral that is neither your home nor your vehicle. See the last sentence of Section 1325(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (tucked in right after subsection (a)(9)). This means that if the debt is any older than 1 year, you CAN do a cramdown.
So, if you have a debt, more than 1 year old, secured by something other than your home or vehicle(s), in which the collateral is worth less than the debt, you can cram down the debt to the value of the collateral. If so, then because this can only be done under Chapter 13, that would be one factor in favor of filing under Chapter 13 instead of Chapter 7. Talk to your attorney to see if this applies to you, and to find out all the other Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13 factors to weigh in your situation.
